Российский вестник Российский вестник детской хирургии | Page 80
НАУЧНЫЕ ОБОРЫ
2016 Том VI № 1
54. Myburgh J. A., Finfer S., Bellomo R. et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care // New
Engl. J. Med. 2012, Nov 15. Vol. 367. No 20. P. 1901–1911.
55. Perner A., Haase N., Guttormsen A. B. et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis // New
Engl. J. Med. 2012, Jul 12. Vol. 367. No 2. P. 124–134.
56. Guidet B., Martinet O., Boulain T. et al. Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethylstarch
130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study // Crit. Care. 2012, May
24. Vol. 16. No 3. P. 94.
57. Béchir M., Puhan M. A., Fasshauer M., Schuepbach R. A., Stocker R., Neff Th. A . Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl
starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial // Crit. Care. 2013. Vol. 17.
P. 299.
58. Vlachou E., Gosling