Zero to 1 Hundred 2015 March Issue | Page 4

Infringement - (ĭn-frĭnj′mənt) n. 1. A violation, as of a law, regulation, or agreement. 2. An encroachment, as of a right or privilege: copyright infringement.

The

Business

of

Blurred Lines

www.thefreedictionary.com/infringement

With Pharell earning $5.2 million, Robin Thicke $$5.6 million and T.I. earning $707,774, "Blurred Lines" would be considered a musical and profitable success. The family of the late Marvin Gaye believes that the succesful tune "Blurred Lines" sampled the 70's hit "Got to Give It Up". The Gaye family wants in on the millions and to let Pharell know that it's time to give it up. Although this song was the biggest hit of 2013, many feel that it's impossible not to hear Marvin Gaye's influence in this song. A common thread througout popular music is that most of the music on the radio today repeat the same melodies and rhythm patterns.

In the business world, we see this as a possible case of infringement but in the music world it's considered sampling. In the past, many artist such as James Brown, George Harrison vs Bright Tunes Music Corp., Michael Bolton vs the Isley Brothers, Vanilla Ice vs Queen & Bowie had legal disputes of over the "sampling" of music. Many of these cases were settled out of court and even resulted the release of royalties.

What are you thoughts?

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/blurred-lines-trial-pharrell-says-779355

The federal jury in

Los Angeles awarded the Gaye family

$7.4 million.

#BLURRED

LINES

Who's side are you on ?

Pharell or the Gaye Family

Page 2