World Food Policy Volume/Issue 2-2/3-1 Fall 2015/Spring 2016 | Page 32

World Food Policy - Volume 2, Issue 2/Volume 3, Issue 1, Fall 2015/Spring 2016 Developing Local Sustainable Seafood Markets: A Thai Example Courtney KehoeA, Melissa MarschkeA, Wichitta UttamamuneeB, Jawanit KittitornkoolB & Peter VandergeestC Increasing awareness of degradation in ocean ecologies and fisheries has made seafood a leading edge in the green marketing movement, with most major buyers in the global North committing to buying seafood that has been certified as sustainable. But what about the significant and growing Asian markets, where seafood has become a healthy and prestigious food choice among wealthier consumers? Is it possible to develop a market for sustainably produced seafood among Asian consumers motivated by civil and ecological concerns? To address these questions our research traces how a Thai Fisherfolk Shop, located 4 hours to the south of Bangkok, has worked to develop an alternative market for seafood caught by local, small-scale fishers. Although we find that there is a mismatch between the volume of aquatic species that fishers catch, the ability of the Shop to process, store, and sell seafood, and consumer demand, our analysis suggests that it is possible to create a market for smallscale, sustainably sourced seafood in Thailand. Keywords: small-scale fishers, sustainable seafood, conventions theory, consumer awareness, Asian markets Introduction certification and ecolabeling. Under ecolabeling schemes, retailers and food companies seek to enhance brand value through an association with sustainability. Producers, in turn, may gain access to particular markets for sustainably harvested seafood, often in the EU and in North America. Although the effectiveness of these mechanisms in terms of their ability to increase ecological sustainability remains unclear, ecolabeling continues to grow in prominence (Lay 2012; Ponte 2012; Hallstein and Villas-Boas 2013). T he sustainable seafood movement began nearly two decades ago in response to failing fisheries management and the subsequent degradation of ocean ecologies and fisheries (Jacquet and Pauly 2007; Konefal 2013). Driven largely by nongovernmental organizations (NGO), industry, and the private sector, this movement sought to fill a governance gap through the use of market mechanisms like third-party A University of Ottawa, Canada Prince of Songkla University, Thailand C York University, Canada B doi: 10.18278/wfp.2.2.3.1.3 32