World Food Policy Volume/Issue 2-2/3-1 Fall 2015/Spring 2016 | Page 111

World Food Policy Table 2 Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line by province, percent Estimated from Vulnerability Surveys Estimated by LNS 2007 2008 2010 2006 2008 Hà Tĩnh 24.8 21.9 16.7 26 29 Thừa Thiên Huế 16.1 11.7 10.6 14 13 Đắk Lắk 19.0 16.4 14.4 17 22 Total 20.6 17.5 14.4 15.9 14.5 Source: Author’s calculations from vulnerability surveys in Vietnam and Le, Nguyen, and Singh (LNS) (2014). The Patterns of Poverty Transitions Across the poor have low incomes and low asset Groups levels so they tend to live together and share their limited resources (see Table Over the three-year period, the 3). majority of households stayed nonpoor There is a tendency that young (slightly over 62 percent) and the other and old households, headed by young 38 percent was vulnerable to poverty or old persons, are more vulnerable to at some level. This pattern shows good poverty than middle-aged ones. They progress in poverty reduction in which are less likely to stay nonpoor and are a large share of the population rose up, more likely to fall into poverty, fluctuate approximately 15 percent, and a small around the poverty line, or stay poor. share of the population fell down at Young households are usually newly slightly more than 9 percent. Additionally, formed ones, which mean that they also a tenth of the population moved around have to invest in bearing and caring for the poverty line (closed to 11 percent) children. Older households are usually and only a small share stayed poor in all wealthier because they have experience periods (2.3 percent) (see Table 3). in agriculture and livestock production The changes in poverty statuses differ and have accumulated more savings across the subgroups of the population. and assets. However, older heads are Poverty is usually associated with a associated with having lower skills and large-sized family and a higher burden being less healthy subsequently making of dependency. Nonpoor households them more vulnerable to poverty, which tend to have fewer members and a lower is confirmed by the result of a t test. dependency ratio, 4.1 and 0.4 respectively, The education attainment of a while those who are poor in at least one household’s head tends to have a negative period have nearly five members and a relationship with the vulnerability to higher dependency ratio of 0.5. In fact, poverty. Slightly higher than 56 percent 111