Washington Business Fall 2015 | Legislative Review | Page 33

issue area reports | taxation Taxation Amber Carter: Tax and Fiscal Policy Going into the 2015 session, AWB knew lawmakers would consider taxes as a way to solve their budget challenges resulting from the McCleary decision on K-12 education funding. Our goal was to end the session with a balanced budget that funded education while also promoting and protecting economic development opportunities and our state’s competitiveness. Early on, the governor and House Democrats advocated for tax increases while Senate Republicans offered solutions that used the $3.2 billion in additional revenue to balance the budget without raising taxes. A compromise was ultimately reached in order to avoid a government shutdown. The deal funded K-12 education at historic levels, though it also included some taxes. In order for the agreement among lawmakers to work, several steps became necessary, including lifting the Initiative 601 spending limit, transferring funds from the extraordinary revenue account and addressing the classroom size requirements called for under Initiative 1351. HB 1106/SB 5077 operating budget Passed/AWB Supported The budget was a complicated mess this session largely due to the requirements for ongoing funding for K-12 education called for in the 2012 McCleary state Supreme Court ruling. Both the House and Senate provided $1.3 billion in new funding in their original budgets — although they had dramatically different approaches to their balance sheet when it came to taxes. The Senate relied on a no-new-tax plan and the influx of $3.2 billion in new revenue from growing tax projections, while the House relied on $1.5 billion in new taxes, including a capital gains tax, sales tax on bottled water and business taxes. AWB testified in opposition to House Bill 1106, the House Tom Pucci of Expedia, the secretary/treasurer of the AWB Board, testifies before the House Finance Committee. Bill considered as part of AWB’s voting record Favorable outcome for Washington businesses budget, asking for their support of SB 5077, the Senate approach. The House budget passed 51-47 in the regular session and was opposed by AWB. The bill was revised in the second special session and reduced the tax request to roughly $500 million. Meanwhile, the Senate passed their budget in the regular session by a vote of 26-23. The differences in approaches led to a third special session where a final budget was ultimately adopted. Senators proposed SB 6051 as a temporary budget in the event that lawmakers could not reach an agreement by June 30. The final budget, SB 6052, provides an additional $2.7 billion investment in K-12 and brings overall education spending to $18.2 billion — more than 47 percent of the state’s budget, a level that hasn’t been reached in 30 years. The budget also reduces tuition at state colleges and universities, helping 200,000 students and their families. Funding was also provided for an AWB priority to continue the upgrade to the legacy computer system used by the Department of Revenue. AWB supports many aspects of the final budget though we are disappointed that it relied on tax increases found in SB 6138, an unnecessary component to the final agreement. Missed Opportunities special edition 2015 31