VISION Issue 9 | Page 14

14 Vision Magazine Yet it’s not really a radical re-working of form. We wanted to alter the experience of approach and occupancy. More importantly, once across the bridge and threshold through the front door, the visitor is really detached from the land and floating as it were. Those two key walls facing the ocean are now fully glazed. We wanted to enhance the architectural experience rather than overhaul its essential design. Substance rather than style was really the aim. Were you tempted to stray from the original to make your own mark? We were conscious of the elements that made this house so expressive and singular. It’s a politically incorrect house and yet it is an act of great bravado. It’s probably three times the height limit of what would be permitted today. We made the choice to maintain the profile but re-work that original gesture with new materials. A whole forest of these structures along the coast may not be great, but the fact is someone did this and it’s worth celebrating. Were you daunted by the prospect of re-working such an iconic structure? It’s so well known and there’s an expectation that comes with working on iconic buildings. In the end you have to knuckle down and bring design rigour. That was ultimately the best way to maintain design integrity. It has always been a very polarizing statement from the outset, attracting and repelling in equal measure. We saw it as a very iconic part of popular culture. It’s a brilliant act of bravado. Looking at it closely there wasn’t quite the quality you would see with one of the great architectural masters, but we were deferential to the original idea. We were also adding a new house to the site as a background house and not competing with the visual impact of the original. Prima Donna