VISION Issue 51 | Page 31

31 What about key objectives? The building should make learning visible internally and from both quadrangle and street. The building should act as a teacher, embedding cues to different scientific, artistic and mathematical concepts to spark the curiosity of students. The Nautilus Centre is pretty anti-silo study in that it promotes a real bond between the Arts Sciences and Humanities. The rationale for a new building rather than refurbishment came from the desire to change the pedagogy and link subjects across the curriculum. Feedback from staff and students suggests this has already occurred – teachers are exploring new ways of delivering curriculum, students are encouraged to work differently, and on our many visits since occupation we see students working in many different learning modes. Were there any concerns about a design as too revealing or ‘open’? Any concerns the building might be too open and transparent have not been borne out in practise. The turret design in the laboratories is working well because it allows different configurations of tables to suit the activity being undertaken. Staff and students are already using the AV installations to allow more flexible presentation methods with the large touchscreens giving more options for display and interaction. Art now has a large, sun-filled studio with direct links to design spaces and a new outdoor courtyard. “...seamless transitions between indoor and outdoor learning spaces all combine to encourage inter-disciplinary learning and collaboration.” HARIKLIA PONTIKINAS, ARCHITECT