VISION Issue 14 | Page 11

11 Not everyone would invest such trust in an inexperienced architect. You bust some popular myths about what is possible. There is an innocence of youth I suppose. It allows for a fuller exploration of ideas and innovation without preconceptions of what is, or isn’t possible. With so much red tape and legislation, architects often rule out solutions that push the limits of what is considered the norm. From a conceptual viewpoint, it’s important to be ‘on the edge’ and maintain the conceptual design intent. How helpful is it to have a parent as patron, or benefactor to get your career going? There are plenty of ups and downs throughout the whole process. Every month you have the same disputes over claims and things as any building site. It’s just like any other job but there are a different set of issues. There are more personal ones and they all need to be worked through. Were you apprehensive about your design measuring up and keeping the faith? Always. On a project like this I was very concerned throughout the whole process. When you’re given that level of responsibility and dealing with large amounts of money you want to make sure that every step is the right one and to minimize the risk associated with the building. How long did it take to arrive at the essential design? About six to eight months – from concept to planning approval submission. Dealing with council took another six-months. Documentation phase was relatively shorter, we allocated 3 months prior to the project commencing on-site. You mention Los Angeles’ mid-20th century Case Study houses – especially the work of Richard Neutra. What is it about those projects you find irresistible? They’re remarkable houses. A lot of Neutra’s work creates strong horizontal planes and lines that have a wonderful proportion and human scale. I wanted to try and re-create that scale where you feel as though the building isn’t overwhelming, or overbearing.