Vet360 Vet360 Vol 05 Issue 05 | Page 19

SMALL ANIMAL MEDICINE to be fed and often have naso-oesophageal tubes placed, but due to the ileus and gastric stasis, the food accumulates in the stomach and increases their risk of vomiting and aspirating. This risk can be reduced by doing intermittent gastric suction of the stomach content, by either passing a stomach tube intermittently or by placing a nasogastric feeding tube and suctioning out the residual gastric content before feeding. The nasogastric tube can also then be used for enteral feeding. Placing nasogastric tubes as apposed to naso-oesophageal tubes was thought to increase the risk of regurgitation, but a study published in the journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care found that there was no significant differences in adverse occurrences between the groups with naso-oesophageal tubes and those with nasogastric tubes. In people, reinfusing some of the aspirated gastric fluid has been recommended to avoid the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, however In a small population of dogs and cats that underwent intermittent suction over a 36 hour period none developed hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. AP is a well known sequel to general anaesthesia (GA) in dogs. The longer the time under GA, and the more times a patients position is changed are some of the factors that lead to an increase risk for that patient aspirating. Trying to reduce the time under GA along with good presurgical planning could help with these factors. Prolonged food restriction before GA has also been thought to aid in reducing the risk of AP but this has been brought into question by four different studies in dogs where the impact of food withholding on gastroesophageal reflux was reported. The conclusion was that a short (2 to 4 hour) period of food withholding as well as feeding a smaller portion of food with high moisture content (canned dog food) appeared to reduce the risk of gastroesophageal reflux. The optimal duration of withholding water was also evaluated, and determined to be four hours. Treatment Treatment for aspiration pneumonia revolves around treating the underlying cause if possible, administration of intravenous fluids, antibiotics and oxygen therapy along with other supportive care. tract diseases. The group recommends the use of ampicillin or a first generation cephalosporin in patients with aspiration pneumonia and no evidence of sepsis. They also suggest clindamycin could be used for gram-positive and anaerobic coverage, as its lipophilic nature may afford better tissue penetration. When there is evidence of a more life-threatening infection then the recommendations are to add a fluroquinolone and if the animal has a history of being from a shelter or boarding facility and presents with a very mild pneumonia with no systemic signs, mycoplasma could be the underlying infectious agent and doxycycline may be used. When the following factors are present, then obtaining a sample for culture and sensitivity is strongly advised as they are likely to be associated with resistant bacteria: 1. The patient has been on antibiotics within the last four months 2. The aspiration pneumonia is a hospital acquired infection 3. The patient has recurrent bouts of AP The duration of treatment of dogs with AP has also been questioned as the traditional recommendations have been to continue administration of antimicrobials for at least 3-4 weeks, or 1-2 weeks after radiographic resolution. There appears to be no evidence however to support this duration of treatment in either cats or dogs. In the human literature the recommendations are to use antimicrobial therapy for 7 to 10 days and only extend the therapy for 14 days or longer for patients who are immunocompromised or those with unusual infections They also do not advise using the appearance of thoracic radiographs to guide the duration of antibiotic therapy. Specifically, the guidelines recommend “treatment until 72 hours after the patient becomes afebrile and until clinically stable. With this in mind the consensus opinion of the Working Group is that shorter courses of appropriate treatment, might be effective in some veterinary situations as well. They recommend that patients be re-evaluated no later than 10–14 days after starting treatment, and then the decisions to extend treatment should be made based on clinical, haematological, and radiographic findings. The use of CRP may be helpful in decision making at this stage as well. Fluid Therapy Antimicrobial Treatment Ideally, antimicrobial selection should be based on the results of the culture and sensitivity, but it is not always possible to get samples due to financial limitations or patient instability. In these cases broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics should be chosen using the recommendations made by the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Disease Working Group on respiratory Fluids are important to replace fluid losses and maintain hydration. Dehydration causes the respiratory secretions to become more “sticky” due to loss of fluids from the aqueous layer of these secretions. This in turn impairs mucociliary clearance. On the other hand, over hydration can be detrimental to the patient, as it will increase pulmonary interstitial and alveolar fluid accumulation and thereby exacerbate hypoxemia. There are no guidelines as to the use of Issue 05 | NOVEMBER 2018 | 19