Vet360 Issue 6 Volume 2 | Page 14

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ever an outer hypoechoic rim and hyperechoic inner zone may be differentiated with progressive imaging techniques and equipment. This distinction represents the outer cortex and inner medulla.2 (Figure 1 C) Feline adrenal glands are typically more oval bilaterally and homogeneously hypoechoic. It is rare to see the cortico-medullary distinction in a cat. Mineralisation of the adrenal glands is common in cats, occurring in up to 50% of the population.2 Such glands are hyperechoic with a distal acoustic shadow. This change does not however affect the size of the gland. Contrary, mineralisation in canine adrenal glands has a high probability of representing malignant change although rarely, it may be due to dystrophic change. 1,2,3 (Figure 3) nodular hyperplasia. In these cases it may be difficult to distinguish the enlarged hyperplastic gland from an adrenocortical adenoma. 1,2 (Figure 2) Another aetiopathogenesis for bilateral adrenomegaly is trilostane therapy.2,3 This is due to cortical hypertrophy secondary to reduced cortisol production and the diminished negative feedback mechanism. Following trilostane treatment, the glands can also become heter- The cut-off for maximum adrenal gland size in the dog has been commonly referenced as 0.74mm1,2,4 for either the cranial or caudal pole in either a sagittal or transverse plane regardless of body weight of the patient. However a more recent study (n=45), it was found that the size of the adrenal gland in patients without clinical evidence of hyperadrenocorticism varied with three weight categories4. The guidelines from this study are as follows: Maximum thickness of the caudal pole of the adrenal gland in sagittal plane: • Dogs ≤10 kg: ≤0.54cm • Dogs 10-30kg: ≤0.68cm • Dogs ≥ 30kg: ≤0.80cm However the authors do acknowledge limitations to the study, such as the low study numbers and the need to further investigate at risk populations of dogs in order to fine-tun H\