Vermont Bar Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2 Winter 2015, Vol. 40, No. 4 | Page 8

President’s Column 8 learn on-line research skills. So too with paper filings: partners often want paper. The problem is that this comes with a price. We will lose clients, cases, and the ability to keep up with the pace of legal work. Paperless offices with case management software simply can do more and do it faster. They can start to re-shape practices along economies of scale and take advantage of reduced costs. On this latter note, paperless offices using cloud-based servers will not require the same-type of office space. The huge storage files and fixed office location stops being necessary. Smaller, less expensive space becomes an option. Remote work spaces are not only possible, they are economically sensible. Physically, practicing law can be different. The challenge in this is anticipating the repercussions of such shifts. To put it in Zen terms, if a lawyer does not have an expensive, imposing office, can she charge a high rate? Will clients want to meet at an attorney’s home? What if that client is a Fortune 500 company?11 At the same time, paperless offices are here to stay. The longer we imagine that we can live without such innovation, the further back we fall. Or to put it in McLu- han’s terms, if we cling to the old boat of the SS Paper-Based, we risk descending into the maelstrom. ____________________ Daniel P. Richardson, Esq., is a partner in the Montpelier firm Tarrant, Gillies & Richardson and president of the Vermont Bar Association. ____________________ The Fate of Democracy in an Electronic Age: A Conversation with Arthur Kroker, in Voices in Democracy 91-92 (Bernard Murchland ed., 2000). 2 See generally Clayton Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma (1997). Christensen posited that some companies failed by putting too much emphasis on a customer’s current needs while ignoring new technologies or business models. The idea of disruptive thinking has been adopted by many business thinkers as a way to develop new value in existing markets. See Kaihan Krippendorff, Out Think the Competition 106-17 (2012) (promoting a set of skills labelled a “disruptive mind-set” as a method to developing responses to business needs). 3 Krippendorff, supra note 2, at 36-38. 4 John Markoff, Armies of Expensive Lawyers, Replaced by Cheaper Software, NY Times, March 3, 2011, at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/05/ science/05legal.html. 5 Jason Tanz, How Airbnb and Lyft Finally Got Americans to Trust Each Other, Wired Magazine, April 23, 2014, at http://www.wired. com/2014/04/trust-in-the-share-economy. 1 THE VERMONT BAR JOURNAL • WINTER 2015 North Carolina attorney Terence McEnally has started this process by creating an app where lawyers can bid to represent individuals who scan and upload their traffic tickets. http://www.berniesez.com. See Amber Rupinta, Raleigh Attorney Develops App for Lawyers to Bid on Your Business, Aug. 13, 2014, at http://abc11.com/ finance/raleigh-attorney-develops-app-for-lawyers-to-bid-on-your-business/256412. 7 Rich Vetstein, Airbnb Rentals Raise Thorny Legal Issues, Massachusetts Real Estate Law, July 24, 2014, at http://massrealestatelawblog. com/2014/07/24/airbnb-rentals-raise-thorny-legal-issues. 8 Sanjay Salomon, Uber’s Problems Keep Piling Up, Boston.com, Nov. 5, 2014, at http://www. boston.com/cars/news-and-reviews/2014/11/05/ uber-problems-keep-piling/K8dkfhVMEqLd1tf6RhwyLK/story.html. 9 Taylor Dobbs, Amazon Shutters Vermont Program Over Tax Issue, Vermont Public Radio News, Jan. 6, 2015, at http://digital.vpr.net/post/amazon-shutters-vermont-program-over-tax-issue. 10 Peter Diamandis, Uber vs. the Law (My Money’s on Uber), Forbes.com, Sept. 8, 2014, at http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterdiamandis/2014/09/08/uber-vs-the-law-my-moneys-onuber. 11 Anecdotally, I know several firms that have heard the following words from a large client: “We usually don’t hire a firm as small as yours … ” 6 www.vtbar.org