Vermont Bar Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2 VBA Journal, Winter Issue, Vol. 41, No. 4 | Page 33

by Mark Bassingthwaighte, Esq. Counsel for Those Considering Entering into Of Counsel Relationships Of Counsel is one of those terms that has multiple meanings. This term has been used as an honorary designation for retired partners, as a special designation for firm attorneys who are neither a partner nor an associate, and as a way to describe part- time attorneys who have created an asso- ciation with a firm. In recent years howev- er, more attorneys seem to want to use the term solely as a way to generate additional business. After all, the public presentation of close ties with another firm can be an effective marketing tool that will drive ad- ditional business to your firm, right? Well perhaps, but there are risks that come into play and these risks should not be taken lightly. What is an Of Counsel Attorney? The Of Counsel designation as envi- sioned by the authors of various ethics opinions refers to something altogether different from a traditional attorney with- in a firm. These opinions generally define an Of Counsel attorney as an attorney who is not a partner, associate, shareholder, or member of a firm, and they further state that an atto rney may only be designated Of Counsel to the firm if the attorney will have a close and continuing relationship with the firm. But any attorney that works with your firm and has a significant degree of shared liability with your firm or mana- gerial responsibilities to your firm and/ or its staff should never be designated as Of Counsel. Related terms such as Special Counsel, Tax Counsel, Senior Counsel, and the like are understood to have the same meaning as Of Counsel and thus the re- quirement of a close and continuing rela- tionship will apply there as well. The requirement of a close and continu- ing relationship has been defined as pro- viding for close, ongoing, regular, and fre- quent contact for the purpose of consulta- tion and advice. Further, the Of Counsel attorney must be more than an advisor on only one case or just a forwarder or receiv- er of legal business. Attorneys can get into serious disciplinary trouble by designating someone who is merely a referral attorney as Of Counsel because that is usually con- sidered to be a misleading client communi- cation in violation of the ethical rules. This is why the idea of creating Of Counsel re- lationships solely for marketing purposes falls flat. www.vtbar.org Who Can Properly Be Designated Of Counsel? Evaluating the appropriateness of the designation in the light of what a disciplin- ary committee could perceive as mislead- ing can help one avoid some of the com- mon Of Counsel designation pitfalls. Re- member the average person will take the term at face value so come at the deci- sion from the perspective of the average person’s expectations. If you are thinking about being listed on another firm’s letter- head as Of Counsel, only do so if you are able to be readily available and actually will provide counsel to that firm. Examples of acceptable relationships for the Of Counsel designation have included, but are not limited to: 1) retired lawyers, 2) withdrawing partner or associate, 3) part- time practitioner, 4) permanent non-part- ner/non-associate, 5) partner on leave, and 6) probationary partner-to-be. Exam- ples of unacceptable relationships for the Of Counsel designation have included, but are not limited to: 1) outside consultants, 2) suspended lawyers, 3) when the affilia- tion involves only a single case, 4) those who merely share office space and nothing more, and 5) public officials who are not engaged in active practice with their for- mer firm. Can a law firm be Of Counsel to anoth- er firm? Can an attorney be of counsel to more than one firm? Can an attorney be Of Counsel to an out-of-state firm? While the answers to these questions can be yes, the reality is that the answers to these ques- tions and a number of others will differ de- pending upon the jurisdiction in which you practice. Given the numerous and varying state specific rules regarding this designa- tion, I would recommend that prior to es- tablishing any Of Counsel relationship you review any relevant ethics opinions and/or contact bar counsel in your jurisdiction. What Are the Risks? There are a few generally applicable is- sues that take on special significance in an Of Counsel affiliation. In particular, imput- ed disqualification, vicarious liability, and insurance coverage disputes warrant spe- cial attention. Imputed Disqualification - For conflict purposes, the Of Counsel affiliation means that the affiliated firm and the Of Counsel attorney will often be treated as one enti- THE VERMONT BAR JOURNAL • WINTER 2016-17 ty. This does mean that the conflicts the Of Counsel attorney brings to the table may prevent the affiliated firm from continuing to represent current or future clients. Like- wise, the Of Counsel attorney has to be concerned about apparent or actual con- flicts between his own clients and those of the affiliated firm. The imputed disqualifi- cation rule is a two-way street and there is little that can be done to correct the prob- lem once it has arisen. Conflict checks can be burdensome and the potential cost in lost business if a conflict is ever missed can be substantial. Always address the conflict issue prior to establishing Of Counsel re- lationships so that everyone understands what the additional burden will be and can agree that the benefits outweigh the costs. Vicarious Liability - While the affiliat- ed firm is not going to be liable for the in- dependent acts and omissions of the Of Counsel attorney that were outside of the apparent scope of the Of Counsel’s involve- ment with the affiliated firm, this doesn’t prevent claims from arising. Problems can and will arise based upon any given client’s perspective of the affiliation. Unrestrictive use of letterhead listing the Of Counsel at- torney by the affiliated firm or by the Of Counsel attorney sends the message that all participants are involved on any and all matters of the firm and/or the Of Counsel attorney, even if this isn’t the case. To help avoid becoming a named co-defendant in each other’s suits, create two versions of letterhead. One will list the Of Counsel at- torney and the other will not. Then only use letterhead showing the Of Counsel attor- ney’s name when that attorney is actually working on a firm matter. Likewise, make sure that the Of Counsel attorney abides by the same rule. Insurance Coverage Disputes - In the unfortunate event of a claim, coverage problems can arise when an affiliated firm has done work on a matter that the Of Counsel attorney had no involvement in or awareness of, but was unfortunately list- ed as Of Counsel on the letterhead that was in use. Should this Of Counsel attor- ney not have coverage under the affiliated firm’s malpractice policy, there may be a significant problem because the Of Coun- sel attorney’s own policy will often not af- ford coverage either. Why is this? The Of Counsel attorney’s own policy will only cover work done on behalf of clients of the named insured which is the Of Counsel’s own firm. In this situation the Of Counsel 33