Vapouround magazine Issue 14 | Page 90

FEATURE FDA Commissioner Calls for both sides of Vape Debate to find Common Ground B y To n y O t t o m a n e l l i I I During his speech announcing the PMTA Deadline Extensions in July, the following comment certainly stood out above the rest. “The ongoing divisive debate on the pros and cons of e-cigarettes. Precious little progress has been made as competing camps dig in on the benefits and risks of the harm reductionist approach of this new technology. Both sides are convinced that they are right, but we see very little progress and virtually no common ground.” - FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb 88 | VM14 Overall, the Commissioner is correct. Though only slightly, not entirely. These particular comments are true about the conditions surrounding the debate on vaping, but is it possible for a negotiation to end up reaching a consensus? That statement is surely an attempt at allowing some type of discussion to be held that results in a shared agreement. We need order and compromise from the anti-vaping establishment. Yet, how can you find common ground with a competing camp that denies genuine testimony from former smokers who quit by vaping? Time and time again the Tobacco Control Industry have inserted themselves into this industry without rhyme or reason. The Vape Industry is not the tobacco industry, but the moral crusaders of numerous Tobacco Control groups insist on refusing to accept vaping as a harm reduction method responsible for saving countless lives. Those who support vaping are typically all former smokers that have moved on from the cancerous combustible tobacco sticks. Or, they are logical individuals who have analysed the scientific evidence proving just how effective vaping is. Repeatedly, the honest and genuine testimonials given by former smokers who attest to the effectiveness of using vapor products to help them quit smoking are ignored in such an insulting fashion by Tobacco Control fanatics. In retrospect, it is entirely understandable and commendable that Dr. Gottlieb is attempting to open up a professional and productive discourse on the vaping debate. After years of refusing to hear-out the vape industry and all the claims of the significance surrounding progress being made, Gottlieb is absolutely a refreshing voice to hear coming from the FDA. In his speech, he was merely laying out his agenda and his expectations. At the very end of his comments highlighted above, he also stated, “On the other hand, there’s a pathway forward that reframes the debate around nicotine.” All in all, this is absolutely true, though do we honestly think these anti-tobacco enforcers in Tobacco Control will even listen? They