The Trusty Servant May 2017 No.123 | Page 2

N o .123 T he T rusty S ervant educational reformer Benjamin Jowett had become a tutor there in 1842: this was the moderniser who was going to turn the ancient university upside down and effectively impose a new liberal disposition, and Ridding seems to have caught something of that spirit. SF:   Ironically, Ridding was probably appointed as a safe pair of hands. But what he did, in the wake of the Clarendon Commission, was to use the window of opportunity, before the new Go Bo emerged, to make changes without needing to ask the weakened Warden and Fellows. He didn’t even need to ask anyone for money – he just got on and did it with his own and that of his wife – about £1.6 million in today’s money. TEG: So now we know where to look, Headmaster, for funds for the new sports complex! TRH: Yes indeed – and I will mention it to my wife on your behalf the very next time I see her. TEG: What about the curriculum? SF: He introduced the first proper teaching of history, science and modern languages. He introduced drawing, music and carpentry. He founded the Glee Club, the Natural History Society and the Shakespeare Reading Society… TRH : …And he certainly set rather a new tone in Chapel. His predecessor and father-in-law had been of a conservative high- church nature – one of John Keble’s closest friends. Ridding was a Jowett man, an Essays and Reviews man, and even his prayers show it. One of them starts off, ‘In times of doubt and questionings, when our belief is perplexed by new learning, new teaching, new of appeal to the Headmaster, but he didn’t do it very quickly, and then he didn’t do it in the right way, so Ridding refused to grant it. He saw the problem in procedural rather than human terms, and he then wrote a letter to The Times in defence of his conduct. The Times criticised him mercilessly, but Ridding simply couldn’t see what all the fuss was about. thought: give us the faithfulness of learners and the courage of believers’. We ought also to talk about Ridding’s wider involvement in national education. No school has produced more chairmen of HMC than Winchester, and that tradition starts with Ridding, who was the first Chair of the HMC committee. SF: We’ve got rather a good resource in the archive in this regard. The history of HMC is currently being written, and it turns out that only the College Archives has a set of the early committee minutes, which are annotated. TRH: Perhaps the best way to understand Ridding is via his buildings. He spread the estate wide. Arguably, he advanced the army beyond its line of command and supply. To some extent, when the School has had problems, they have resulted from this. But what Ridding did was to create for the Victorians their signature school – eat your heart out Thomas Arnold (OW status notwithstanding). Winchester was by its buildings and by its foundation the school of the purest mediaeval Gothic. Ridding was the quintessential Victorian reformer, seeking to marry the best of the past with the best of the present. In educational and architectural terms, he created the Victorian Gothic school, and he did it actu