Trends in Clinical Trial Site Selection and Patient Recruitment | Page 6

Patient barriers to trial participation in the U.S. include lack of health Figure 6. Length of Trial Delays Due to Patient Recruitment8 insurance. Another barrier is committing to additional evaluations, therapies and clinic visits beyond the normal course of treatment, which can be burdensome for older and very ill patients and their caregivers. Also, many people have negative perceptions about clinical trials, feeling trials are too risky, they will receive a placebo, or that trials are for rare or unknown diseases or only for those who have failed PHASE I 42% PHASE II 30% PHASE III 31% with other treatments. More complicated protocols create additional barriers to patient participation, increasing the time it takes to fully enroll a trial. In addition, certain insurers only cover participation in studies for treatment efficacy. after trial initiation to enroll the first patient. Increasingly, sponsors Minimal efforts by healthcare professionals to recruit subjects can and CROs start looking into patient recruitment at the onset of the trial be due to limited information they have on available trials and how to launch, rather than waiting for investigators to become involved. These access them. They may also be unaware of the trial design and reporting parallel efforts of recruitment and site start-up can speed the enrollment requirements, or concerned about loss of control over their patients. process, improving the overall trial timeline. Among other reasons for trial delay is that in global trials, not all sites will start enrolling patients at the same time or rate mainly because of As trial recruitment shifts to a more patient-centric model, drug and differences in regulatory requirements. Also, more-specific, sophisticated device developers identify several study centers with the potential to medicines, such as dual-mechanism treatments and personalized participate in their trial and complete initial regulatory documentation, medicines, are making it more difficult to find qualified patients but do not activate a site until an eligible patient is identified. When a Some sites may never enroll a single patient or take months after trial initiation to enroll the first patient. site is activated, it generally enrolls subjects within a few days. This model channels important resources to productive sites and considers recruitment earlier, achieving significant gains in efficiency. Recruitment Tactics Improving Recruitment Efficiency » Choosing a site with a large patient population that aligns with the study From Site-Centric to Patient-Centric on the trial protocol, standard but still viable ways to recruit patients In a traditional model, patient recruitment is not considered until after research sites and investigators have been identified and prepared and all research documents are collected – a time-consuming, costly process. Moreover, some sites may never enroll a single patient or take months protocol will significantly facilitate patient recruitment. Depending include advertising in traditional media, and direct communication to patients by investigators and their staff, by the area medical community, and by site personnel (such as hospital marketing staff). Some physicians offer seminars to educate patients about clinical trials. clinipace.com 5