Travis AFB Sustainability Study Report Final Sustainability Study Report | Page 63
Purpose of the Implementation Plan
The strategies are designed to address the issues identified during
preparation of the TSS. The purpose of each strategy is to:
eliminate or reduce the adversity of existing compatibility issues
where possible;
avoid future actions, operations, or approvals that would cause a
compatibility issue; and
provide for enhanced and on‐going communications and
collaboration.
To make the strategies easier to use, they are presented in a table format
(Table 2) that provides the strategy and information on when and how that
strategy will be implemented. The strategies are arranged in Table 2 to
correspond with their compatibility factor. The issue within each factor is
presented first to provide a linkage between the strategy and the condition
it is intended to resolve or minimize. Figure 14 highlights the format and
content of the strategy table. The following paragraphs provide an overview
of how to read the information presented for each strategy in Table 2.
Issue or Strategy #. The issue # and strategy # are unique alpha‐numeric
numbers that provide a reference for each specific issue and strategy. The
issue numbers correspond to the issues identified in Chapter 5 Compatibility
Assessment of the Background Report. An additional alphabetical identifier
is added to the issue number for each new strategy. A strategy’s reference
number is composed of the compatibility issue number and this alphabetical
ID (e.g., for Issue COM‐1, the strategies would be identified as COM‐1A,
COM‐1B, etc.).
Military Compatibility Area (MCA). This column indicates the applicable
MCA in which the strategy should be applied, or if the strategy relates to the
whole TSS Study Area. The MCA geographies for the Travis AFB strategies
are defined in Strategy COM‐3A. Some of the strategies are designated as
Travis AFB Sustainability Study Report
“General”, meaning that they do not have a specific geography associated
with them.
Strategy. In bold type is a title that describes the strategy. This is followed
by the complete strategy statement that describes the recommended
action.
Timeframe. This column indicates the projected timeframe of each
strategy. The timeframes describe the year in which a strategy will be
initiated or if it is an on‐going action.
Short‐Term Strategy proposed for initiation in 2018 / 2019
(within a year of TSS completion)
Mid‐Term
Strategy proposed to be initiated in 2020 / 2021
(within 1‐2 years of TSS completion)
Long‐Term Strategy proposed to be initiated in 2022 / 2026+
(3 to 5 years or more from TSS completion)
Responsible Party. At the right end of Table 2 are a series of columns, one
for each jurisdiction, military entity, agency, and organization with
responsibility for implementing the TSS strategies. If an entity has
responsibility relative to implementing a strategy, a mark is shown under
their name. This mark is one of two symbols that represent their role. A
solid square ( ) designates that the entity identified is responsible for
implementing the strategy. A hollow square () designates that the entity
plays a key supporting role, but is not directly responsible for
implementation. The responsible parties are identified by their name or
assigned acronym in the heading at the top of each page. There is also an
“Other” column in the table. This column is for parties that are not primary
JLUS Partners, but may play a role in the implementation of the respective
strategy. Parties identified as responsible or supporting in this column are
identified by name at the bottom of the strategy box.
Page 49