The TRADE 58 | Page 38

[ F I X E D I N C O M E L E A D E R S S U M M I T 2 0 1 8 ] BUY-SIDE MUST ADAPT TO RISE OF FIXED INCOME AUTOMATION TO FLOURISH, SAYS PANEL HEADS OF TRADING FROM PICTET ASSET MANAGEMENT AND BLUEBAY ASSET MANAGEMENT UNDERLINE THE IMPORTANCE OF ADAPTABILITY AS TRADING TECHNOLOGIES BECOME MORE AUTOMATED. T he increasing emergence of au- tomated processes within fixed income trading means buy-side desks must adapt to evolve along- side these developments, according to buy-side heads of trading. “We’re at an interesting point in time, a point of transition, where buy-side dealers are having to adapt to the role, to new services and ways of finding liquidity, and they need to either embrace those changes or go find themselves an- other job,” said Carl James, global head of fixed income trading at Pictet Asset Management. Discussing what impact the growth of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems in fixed income means for the role of the human trader going forward, James and other speakers agreed that while human traders will see their workflows change, this doesn’t necessarily mean they will be replaced. “This trajectory is set, this path of taking on machine learning and AI-driven investment is happen- ing,” James commented. “Currently at Pictet we do systematic trading which the dealers have embraced and are evolving, which I am de- lighted by.” Stuart Campbell, head of trading at BlueBay Asset Management, highlighted how increased use of automated systems allows buy-side 38 // TheTrade // Winter 2018 desks to fully utilise segregated trader skillsets, although he also underlined that many examples of automation are not anywhere near the finished product yet. “It’s important not to confuse rules-based trading with AI; I don’t think we can look at them as one and the same,” said Campbell. “What we are talking about right now is the infancy of AI for fixed income, but it won’t be too long be- fore the robot, or whatever you call it, is suggesting to me to ask three brokers, not five, and ask these three specifically. So, we will get that where it can predict the best possible outcome; whether they can achieve it or not is different.” Speaking to the benefits of adapt- ing to new systems, James said that while not all buy-side firms will see the same level of applicabil- ity, there are distinct advantages to using machine learning or AI systems in the pre-trade space “It’s important not to confuse rules-based trading with AI; I don’t think we can look at them as one and the same.” STUART CAMPBELL, BLUEBAY ASSET MANAGEMENT to better inform traders and add greater value. “As a buy-side dealer you can be passive, waiting for something to happen, so when the order comes in you can start to action it. Howev- er, if you are proactive and actually offer up where liquidity is, you understand what they are looking for and what their strategy is,” he commented. Much of the discussions around the use of machine learning or AI- based systems in trading focus on how it will impact the role of the human trader. James detailed that since Pictet implemented its systematic trading system it has not experienced any reduction in headcount across its four trading desks, although this was not the same outcome as seen at BlueBay, which Campbell described as a “real-life example of high-touch/low-touch cycles”. “We created a desk, just over three years ago, for high-touch/ low-touch and then at the begin- ning of this year we collapsed that desk and moved away from that model, which was an interesting break from us,” he explained. “The reason being that over time there is going to be far more automated fixed income execution and we felt that the low-touch wasn’t actually adding much value, that there’s wasn’t a real need for that desk.”