The State Bar Association of North Dakota Summer 2015 Gavel Magazine | Page 36

DISCUSSION It should be emphasized that this committee renders its opinion on the basis of the facts reported by the requesting attorney. There has been no independent review of the underlying facts and specifically of the underlying litigation. It is simply presumed for the sake of this opinion that the requesting attorney is correct in the information that has been provided. An attorney has an obligation to protect the property of a Client. North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.15 provides in relevant part: (a) A lawyer shall hold property of Clients . . . that is in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation separate from the lawyer’s own property.... Other property shall be identified as such and appropriately safeguarded. Complete records of such . . . other property shall be kept by the lawyer in the manner prescribed in paragraph (h). * * * (d) Upon receiving, in connection with a representation, funds or other property in which a Client or third person has an interest, a lawyer shall promptly notify the Client . . . . Except as stated in this rule or otherwise permitted by law or by agreement with the Client, a lawyer shall promptly deliver to the Client . . . any funds or other property that the Client . . . is entitled to receive and, upon request by the Client . . . shall promptly render a full accounting regarding such property. * * * (h) A lawyer shall maintain or cause to be maintained on a current basis records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of this Rule. Such records shall be preserved for at least six years after termination of the representation. (Emphasis added). The comments to the Rule further detail an attorney’s obligation to maintain and preserve a client’s property: “A lawyer should hold property of others with the care required of a professional fiduciary. All property that is the property of clients . . . must be kept separate from the lawyer’s business and personal property.” N.D.R. Prof. Conduct Rule 1.15, cmt. 1. And “[a] lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.” N.D.R. Prof. Conduct Rule 1.3. 36 THE GAVEL Rule 1.15 includes the duty to promptly deliver property to a client and there is an obligation to retain the property indefinitely until it can be returned to the owner. A prior ethics committee opinion does permit property to be returned to the client’s authorized representative. See SBANO Ethics Comm. Op. No. 1997-10 (allowing an attorney holding personal property of client to deliver the property to a person authorized by the client to receive the property). Because Rule 1.15(d) provides that a lawyer “shall promptly deliver” to the client “other property,” a lawyer must pay the costs associated with delivery, absent an agreement to the contrary. Further, N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(h) provides only that “records” be preserved for six years after termination of the representation. This provision should not be construed as suggesting that the property itself, if unable to be delivered in accordance with Rule 1.15(d), should only be preserved for six years following the termination of representation. The subject of Rule 1.15(h) are the records, not the property. The property, therefore, must be held and delivered to the client, unless other arrangements are agreed upon. N.D.R. Prof. Conduct Rule 1.15(a) and (d). Here, Attorney and Client agreed that the property would be stored by Attorney “temporarily,” until such time Client could make arrangements to take the property. “Temporarily” was not defined in the agreement. The ordinary definition of “temporary” is: “That which is to last for a limited time only, as distinguished from that which is perpetual, or indefinite, in its duration.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1464 (6th ed. 1990). At the same time, the agreement to store the property “temporarily” cannot mean that the Attorney who agreed to store the property is not also bound by the requirements of N.D.R. Prof. Conduct Rule 1.15, which require a lawyer to hold the property until the lawyer delivers it to the client. Stated another way, the qualifying word “temporarily” in the agreement between the Attorney and Client is essentially rendered meaningless because a lawyer has a duty under Rule 1.15 to hold the client’s property with the same care as that of a fiduciary until such time the lawyer can deliver the property to the client. North Dakota’s Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (“Act”), N.D.C.C. Ch. 4730.1, does not apply to tangible property. In addition to analyzing the statute, inquiry was made to the North Dakota Department of Trust Lands, which is the st ]HY