(As a brief aside: readers need not worry that they
are “supposed” to believe any of this. The important
thing here is that everything we have said thus far
is a thousand times more coherent than any argument that could be made in support of the idea
that the Divine would prefer to suppress life rather
than nurture and cultivate it. We do not claim to
have a “perfect” comprehension of the Divine or
all that pertains to origin of existence itself—it is
sufficient that we can prove our models superior to
those ideas and models promulgated and used by
the witting and unwitting architects and supporters
of slavery.)
EXISTENCE IS DEPENDENT
ON MOTION IN FORM
When the Divine decided to create the Universe—
however that event might have taken place—it
could only have done so by first positively identifying
what it wanted to create. Then, after determining
“what” it wanted to create, the next step must have
been to determine how creation could feasibly be
created and maintained—the “how” of creation
would be what many call “Natural Law.” It is selfevident that in order for the Universe to be more
than simply a static image, or an amorphous wad of
energy, the Universe required structure and rules.
Astronomical systems, energy systems, biological
systems, ecosystems, etc., all need to be positively
defined in order for the Divine to realize its goal of
creating a functional Universe.
The key to grasping Natural Law is to thoroughly
contemplate the following: how do ideas project
into dimension non-destructively, ad infinitum?
If that sounds awfully complex, rest assured that a
simple analogy will illustrate what we mean: simply imagine a software developer writing a piece of
software. Obviously, one can’t write a program that
contradicts itself or structurally undermines itself;
otherwise the software will be faulty and crash.
Similarly, the Divine necessarily must account for
how information can project into dimension without cancelling itself out or introducing catastrophic
computational errors, otherwise existence could
not sustain. If the Divine did not perfectly account
for how information would necessarily have to
project and move within dimension non-destructively, then the Universe itself would have been
a stillbirth. And this is why we have such things
as distinct types of matter, consistent patterns of
energy-exchange, biological-ecological relationships, laws of physics, etc.—this is why Natural Law
is unchanging and, ultimately, unbreakable.
Owing to the necessity for existence to follow certain rules, it would seem to follow that the Universe
would be ultimately deterministic in nature. This
is certainly true to the extent that existence cannot
contradict its own premises—but this doesn’t necessarily mean that those very same rules don’t allow
for a wide range of choice for individual minds
living inside the Universe. For example, one can
choose to walk off a cliff or refrain from walking off
a cliff, but if one chooses the former, then certain
consequences will necessarily follow. In other
words, one has freedom of choice within a certain
range, but no one can abrogate or suspend the
operation of Natural Law (even with a giant hadron collider…). So if one chooses to walk off a cliff
and then subsequently injures oneself or perishes,
it bears no reflection whatsoever upon the “Will of
the Divine”; instead, full culpability rests with the
one who made the decision.
TheSovereignVoice.Org