When mothers leaving violent relationships report
issues of domestic violence or sexual abuse, they
are typically accused of alienating the father, typically resulting in the Judiciary ordering custody of
the child subject of child abuse allegations (even
when it can be proved) be given to the party who
perpetrated the abuse.”
Society talks about protecting children from harm,
and we usually assume it's the parents abusing their
children, but right within the halls of power, the supposed seat of justice, there is massive abuse and breach
of rights occurring with little to any consequences for
the governmental agents and officials involved.
At the very core of this trial that never was is the
inability of the U.N. to enforce its treaties, its
conventions — and those that suffer for it are the
children, not only at the hands of abusive parents,
but on the orders of judges and other agents within
a system that has failed spectacularly to answer to
its own fictions.
The U.N. itself has no real way of enforcing
governments to comply and work on a method of
cooperation between parties. Meanwhile more
children suffer, legally.
Historically, the barbarity that passes for civilisation
dictated that to ensure some semblance of civility,
human rights ought to be encapsulated into law
by modern nations. Thus arose the United Nations
International Declaration of Human Rights. You
can read the history here. Today it is a well-known
fact that the biggest abusers of this convention on
Human Rights are the state parties themselves:
Governments.
Australia has never had a good human rights
record. The rights of the child however are not
well known, and are constantly violated.
SOVEREIGN RIGHTS
Our rights are given to us by our creator at birth.
These are inalienable rights, which means they are
not dependent upon the laws or customs or beliefs
of any culture or government and they cannot be
repealed or limited by human laws, unless there is
corruption in the way of force and abuse within any
of these systems (culture, government, religion).
Humans standing in this sovereignty, this natural
justice, need no law to tell them how to do right by
others, nor do good people have to be told how to
do right by children.
“Do no harm” is the fundamental principal of
natural justice, and in their way these U.N. Rights
of the Child seem to be based upon our inalienable
sovereign rights, yet the UN's own member states,
193 at last count, refuse to administer these rights,
or are unable to, and there appears to be little
accountability or consequence.
It is a façade in which all of us, especially our children,
are being abused and exploited by the very system
and its fictions we have been taught to trust and obey.
Tat this system can take away our inalienable rights,
and that of our children, should be a warning bell
to all. It has become a system that is increasingly
unaccountable to its own fictions, and grows ever
more corruptible with seeming impunity, while our
children bear the brunt.
Sadly, if our children were trade deals the problems
would have been rectified by now. Sanctions would
have been slapped on the Commonwealth of Australia
for not integrating these rights into law and policy
after twenty-five long years, as it obligated itself to do.
Indeed, the Australian Family Law Act of 1975 has
not been updated to include the UNCRC, and still
considers children to be chattel. Isn't this a breach
in itself? How many children have suffered and will
continue to suffer because government officials have
failed to take responsibility for making good on their
word to honor the UNCRC?
Crruption is endemic within the halls of power,
and because of it the U.N. and its nation states are
increasingly perceived as impotent.
TheSovereignVoice.Org