E M P O W E R M E N T T O O L - TH
by Damon OC
With differing understanding comes differing
agreement, hence lack of mutual consent.
You’re not the boss of me.
Are we really so enlightened that we gave up the illusion of ‘divine right to rule’ hundreds of years ago,
yet we somehow believe in inherent obligation? Are
they not the same concepts?
When your perception is a deception your reality
will be hell. Real eyes, realize, real lies.
As a maxim, ‘a matter must be expressed to be
resolved’
Trust Law, very much the foundation of Government and it’s Authority, relies on TRUST.
As a necessity for a TRUST relationship, honesty
and full expression must be present.
Without honesty and full expression, mutual
understanding is missing.
Any suppression of knowledge or lack of transparency is the intentional creation of ignorance and
will produce a difference in understanding.
The misrepresentation of any color of law (statue,
code, ordinance, bylaw, legislation) as an inherent
obligation (without need of consent) is deceit, once
again producing a difference of understanding.
The right to free will choice, hence the option to
agree or not, to consent or not consent, and the
right to separate one self from Government is self
evident.
The concept of consent is reflected in the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, and is an
essential element of the Governments that exist
today - “When in the Course of human events it
becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the
political bands which have connected them with
another … decent respect to the opinions of man
TheSovereignVoice.Org