TO BECOME
A FOUNDING
I.T.N.J
ADVOCATE
ENTER HERE
of the United States of America, Inc., represented
by their respective Governors pledged the “full
faith and credit” of their States and their citizenry,
to the aid of the National Government represented
by the “United States of America, Inc.”, and formed
numerous committees, such as the “Council of State
Governments”, the “Social Security Administration”,
etc., to purportedly deal with the economic “Emergency” caused by the bankruptcy.
These organizations operated under the “Declaration of Interdependence” of January 22, 1937, and
published some of their activities in “The Book of
the States.”
The Reorganization of the bankruptcy is located in
Title 5 of the United States Code Annotated. The
“Explanation” at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most
informative reading. The “Secretary of Treasury”
was appointed as the “Receiver” in Bankruptcy.
(See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903,
Public Law 94‐564, Legislative History, pg. 5967)
As a Bankrupt loses control over his business, this
appointment to the “Office of Receiver” in bankruptcy had to have been made by the “creditors”
who are “foreign powers or principals”. As revealed
by Title 27 USC 250.11 and elsewhere, the “Secretary of the Treasury” being referenced is the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico, an Officer of
the Federal United States who was designated as the
“Receiver” in bankruptcy by the Foreign Creditors
(banks).
The United States as Corporator, (22 U.S.C.A.
286E, et seq.) and “State” (C.R.S. 24‐36‐ 104, C.R.S.
24‐60‐1301(h)) declared “Insolvency” according
to 26 I.R.C. 165(g)(1), U.C.C. 1‐201(23), C.R.S.
39‐22‐‐103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75
Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d
911; Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall. 447).
A permanent state of “Emergency” was instituted
within the Union and the Federal Reserve has acted
as the “fiscal and depository agent” of the “creditors” ever since. Please note that the member banks
of the Federal Reserve are all privately owned corporations, 22 U.S.C.A. 286d.
The government, by becoming a “corporator” (See:
22 U.S.C.A. 286e) lays down its sovereignty and
takes on that character and status of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived
from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the
United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed.
(9 Wheat) 244, U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242).
The Corporate Charter adopted by the “federal
corporation”, aka, US Corp, included the Constitution of the United States of America as its By‐Laws,
which are of course, as By‐Laws subject to change
and interpretation just like any other corporate
By‐Laws. The Constitution of the United States of
America also remains as a public commercial contract which is being “traded upon” by corporations
claiming to be successors and holders in due course
of the original contractual agreement known as The
Constitution for the united States of America.
The real party in interest in the bankruptcy proceedings is self‐evidently not the de jure “United
States of America” or “State”, but “The Bank”
and “The Fund.” (22 U.S.C.A. 286, et seq., C.R.S.
11‐60‐103) These acts, committed under fraud,
force, and seizure are many times done under “Letters of Marque and Reprisal,” i.e. “recapture” (31
U.S.C.A. 5323), in behalf of Foreign governments at
war. This is an important point to remember as this
discussion goes forward in time.
TheSovereignVoice.Org