THE GREAT DISCLOSURE AS INFORMED CONSENT
By Clint Richardson
realitybloger.wordpress.com
It’s all over the news. Disclosure, disclosure,
disclosure. It is the revelation of organized crime at
the highest levels. It is the revealing of slave colony
Earth. And it all has a very important purpose.
It’s not the fact that government committed treason
upon the people that is being talked about per say,
but that some dude blew the whistle on that government treason and is now seeking asylum from a
government that seeks to punish him for his bravery.
And then there’s Wikileaks…
We are supposed to believe that there is a rogue
white-haired ghost out there posting government
secrets that somehow he and only he has been able
to tap. And somehow he has eluded capture for his
whistle-blowing, despite the monstrous world-wide
surveillance apparatus and smart-grid that has been
set up and capable of spotting a pimple on Saddam
Hussein’s white ass.
And the news reports the horrors of the act of
disclosure, even while they disclose the crimes of
government.
But what about the actual crimes and treason committed under color of law by government?
What about the disease of organized crime that
goes unpunished just because it goes under the
moniker of “government“?
This great disclosure of secret government dirty
deeds and military crimes has a very specific purpose that most of us have not considered. That is,
to create understanding and acquiescence to these
treasonous facts by organized government criminals of the world as just the way it is…
In other words, this disclosure of crime creates
what can be termed “informed consent“.
While the official act of obtaining informed consent
is generally done within public notices and meetings, voting, and through other official means, the
mere flooding of the airwaves and newspapers with
information creates a much more devious form of
consent of the people to government crime.
You see, government is exposing to the people its
conspiracies. A conspiracy is simply a plan between
two or more persons (a person being legally defined
as a corporation – and each politician is actually
incorporated as a “corporation sole”).
But there is one problem… a conspiracy (in law)
does not exist unless first proven in a court of law.
This simply means that while a conspiracy may
have been happening for 10’s or 100’s of years, it is
not officially recognized as such until a government
court officially recognizes the facts of the conspiracy. Ironically, before this can happen, the best
“conspiracy theory” must be argued in court with
proper evidence. Until the court officially states
that it is a conspiracy, anyone who claims such is
nothing but a conspiracy theorist. We can point
our fingers and report all we want on the blatant
conspiracies happening daily in government, and
yet the conspiracy (organized plan between two
or more persons to defraud and harm the people)
doesn’t technically exist until the court says it does.
Black’s Law 4th Edition defines theory in law:
THEORY OF CASE. Facts on which the right of
TheSovereignVoice.Org