The Science Behind the Law of Attraction Magazine December, 2016 | Page 44
been done to Dr. Brian Hooker, a fellow scientist and autism
advocate. Thomson would help Hooker write an article on the
CDC fraud as well as turn over more than 10,000 documents to
the office of Congressman William Posey and apply for federal
whistleblower protection. The office of Congressman Jason
Chaffetz, head of the powerful House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee is now actively investigating
this case.
I applied for and was granted access to this trove of documents
and while I have been investigating autism for many years, the
scope of what has taken place has staggered me. Both political
parties have actively avoided studying this issue and sometimes
when you think you just can?t get any more cynical, you read
another document which does exactly that.
And yet at the same time I discovered that the burden of
keeping such dark secrets was corrosive not just on the individuals themselves, but on the institutions as a
whole. And I did find brave individuals, like Congressman Dan Burton, Congressman Dave Weldon,
Congressman Bill Posey, and Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, who have been waging lonely battles to get to
the truth. I even hold out hope that Congressman Jason Chaffetz?s House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee will eventually subpoena Dr. Thompson so that three years after this story broke in the autism
world, the rest of America and the world can learn about it.
HOPE
And t here is t he possibil it y of dramat ic progress against t his t erribl e disease. A researcher from the
University of California, San Diego, Dr. Robert Naviaux, has been able to quickly reverse autism in three
different animal models by the administration of a century-old pharmaceutical, suramin. Suramin is a
medication with more than a century of use against African sleeping sickness. Naviaux was abl e t o reverse
aut ism in an animal model caused by maternal immune activation (overstimulating the immune system of a
pregnant mouse causes autism-like features in her offspring), mice that have Fragile X syndrome, and mice
with autism who are the human age equivalent of thirty years old.
According to Naviaux?s theory, human cells have something called a ?cell danger response?, in which the cells
cut off communication with each other when they sense a certain danger. That danger could be chemical,
bacterial, or viral, and it sometimes
happen that this response mechanism
gets stuck. ?When cells stop
communicating, children stop talking,?
Naviaux has been quoted as saying.
Suramin gets the cells to start talking to
each other.
Naviaux has completed his first human
trials, and while I do not know the
results with certainty, I have heard
rumors that the results have been
overwhelmingly positive. The findings
are scheduled to be published
Page 44 - December, 2016