The Portal July 2014 | Page 24

THE P RTAL July 2014 Page 24 Displacement of Reverence Why silence in the art gallery, but pandemonium in church? Geoffrey Kirk ponders this conundrum Arecent visit to Siena has drawn my attention to a phenomenon which I had not previously noticed. I will call it the ‘displacement of reverence’. Let me explain. The Duomo of Siena is of course an unparalleled repository of fine art: the glorious pulpit of Nicolo Pisano, the frescoes of Pinturicchio in the Piccolomini Library, sculptures by Bernini and Michaelanglo. It is also (obviously) a place of worship, where the Blessed Sacrament is reserved. But as a tourist attraction – at twelve euros a time – it has all the calm of a cattle market. Pushchairs full of infant art lovers vie with teenagers taking selfies and adults vainly trying (or not) to restrain both. Occasionally a stentorian female over a loudspeaker system barks a request for silence, which everyone present enthusiastically ignores. It is true that my latest visit coincided with the post-Easter school holidays, and in consequence there was an unusual preponderance of parties of disaffected yoof, but the lady at the main door assured me that this was now pretty well par for the course. things they have come to see. It is at best ‘heritage’ and at worst Disneyland. The objects have become tragically opaque to the mystery which their creators intended them to express. They have been reduced to mere entertainment; a slideshow between ice-creams. Perhaps – only perhaps - there is a residual awareness of their sanctity; but that creates disaffection rather Consider, then, the contrast with the Museo del than reverence. The modern world does not do ‘holy’. Opera next door, where Duccio’s glorious Majesta is displayed in a darkened room to awestruck spectators shading their eyes from the glory of God who view it in silent reverence. The same is true of the In the art gallery it is different. There works of art are other exhibits - though, of course, none is so spectacular. revered as works of man, not as signs of transcendence. Why the silence in the one case and the pandemonium ‘Isn’t it marvellous that they could do things like that in the other? It is a question to be pondered. Why does all those years ago’. When the threat of transcendence there seem to be such a conflicting reaction to works is removed, and the art object is no longer a sign, and of art in the Church and in the gallery? no more than an object, then reverence returns. But beware: Duccio’s Majesta, the Isenheim altar piece, The answer, I think, must lie in the radical secularisation Mona Lisa, Picasoo’s Guernica and a mandolin by of modern society. Visitors to the Cathedral