The Portal Archive November 2012 | Page 7

THE P RTAL November 2012 Page 7 Charles Villiers Anglican Stanford Luminary by Fr Keith Robinson One really important aspect of “Anglican Patrimony” which we have not yet explored must surely be Anglican church music. Music has been extremely formative in the development of what might be called an “Anglican worship ethos”. There were the great Tudor composers of the Reformation period, and outstanding figures like Purcell at the Restoration, but by the early nineteenth century church music, along with much else, had dropped to a low ebb. The later nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw a restoration of standards which accompanied something of a musical renaissance. The hugely gifted and influential composer who spear- headed this “renaissance” was Charles Villiers Stanford. early works he subsequently rejected, but over 200 works remain. These include seven symphonies, concertos, oratorios, songs, anthems and motets and organ works. He was always very enthusiastic about opera, but was not generally regarded as successful in that genre! His a biding legacy however, has always been his sacred music, which has never departed from the English Church repertoire. Always dominated by melody, Vaughan Williams spoke of its “imperishable beauty”. Cambridge musical scene dictatorial and bad-tempered Stanford was born in 1852, into a wealthy and extremely musical family in Dublin. Charles was sent at an appropriate age to Cambridge to read Classics, the subject determined by his father, but he so immersed himself in the Cambridge musical scene, that he managed to scrape only a rather poor third class degree. Whilst still an undergraduate he was appointed Organist of Trinity College, where he so distinguished himself that he was allowed to complete further musical studies in Leipzig and Berlin. Although already formed as a musician in the English tradition, it was in these places that he met Brahms, Schumann and Wagner, and in different ways these great composers began to influence the development of Stanford’s style. Stanford has something of a reputation for terseness. He could be dictatorial, bad-tempered and quarrelsome, and was probably quite bitter about being somewhat sidelined by his younger contemporaries Parry and Elgar whom he had previously befriended and encouraged. When he died in March 1924 his ashes were appropriately buried in Westminster Abbey, in the Musicians Aisle (the north choir aisle) close to Purcell, Croft and Blow. There his soaring melodies regularly float over his remains to this day. a huge challenge Works like his setting of Psalm 150, or his motets Justorum Animae, or Beati quorum are possessed of a lightness, a beauty and a spirituality which is characteristically Anglican. Who would forget his founding professor setting of Magnificat in G, with its organ accompaniment In 1882, at the age of twenty-nine, he became a said to represent the motion of the spinning wheel used founding professor of the new Royal College of Music, by our Lady to spin the wool for the Temple curtain and from 1887 also Professor of Music at Cambridge. (which she just happened to be about when Gabriel As a teacher, a positive galaxy of young British came) and the rapturous solo voice? musicians passed through his hands: Gustav Holst, Ralph Vaughan Williams, John Ireland, Frank Bridge, This music is not quite like any other music in the Arthur Bliss, Herbert Howells and Edgar Bainton – all whole of Christendom, and with the Ordinariate’s names which are familiar from any English cathedral’s extremely limited resources it will be a huge challenge music list! to bring it into the Catholic Church with us. But surely we must try to do this, and I’m glad to say there are Stanford’s output was prodigious. Many of his already some signs of determination to do so.