The Portal Archive April 2013 | Page 18

THE P RTAL April 2013 Page 14 Thoughts on Newman Securus judicat orbis terrarum by Br Sean of The Work Doubt is perhaps the most striking contrast one could imagine to faith and holiness. Yet the effect which the witness of holiness has in the lives of Christians can be as powerful as the negative witnesses of despair. Both holiness and doubt have a persuasive, almost contagious power of attraction. The act of putting one’s faith in God, of venturing into the unknown, is an eloquent witness to faith in a personal God who is love. But just as holiness has the power of attraction which urges man to act, so too does the power of doubt when manifested in the lives of others. Newman has often been called the ‘Apostle to the doubtful’ as he was keenly aware of the destructive power which doubts can have in the lives of Christians. the ancient Father, interpreting and summing up the long and varied course of ecclesiastical history, the theology of the Via Media was absolutely pulverised.’ Newman was careful not to share his doubts with anyone at the time, and wrote an article in the British Critic to try to remedy the doubts others were also experiencing. But the article had particularly disconcerted of the younger members of the Oxford Movement. Many who had were engaged in the movement did so with the hope of bringing about a renewal in the Church of England, but now felt that the foundation on which they were b uilding was insecure. Before Newman was received into the Roman Catholic Church he had to wrestle with doubt for many years. However, during this time he was convinced of one principle - no decision made in doubt could be relied upon. For Newman the act of faith was an act which engaged the whole person, both mind and to obey his conscience Wiseman’s article brought one of Newman’s heart. followers, Robert Williams, into a serious conflict schismatic Donatists of conscience. In November 1839 Newman wrote to At the height of the Oxford Movement in 1839 Williams, advising him to obey his conscience. He Newman became gravely concerned when he read an himself vowed that he would ‘try not to be unfaithful article published by Nicholas Wiseman in the Dublin to the light given me. And if at any future time, I have Review. The article, ‘The Anglican Claim to Apostolical any view opened to me, I will try not to turn from Succession’, questioned the Catholicity of the Church it, but will pursue it, wherever it may lead.’ However of England by comparing it to the position of the he advised Williams never to act on the bad counsel schismatic Donatists in the fourth century. which doubt provides: ‘I think I should not, even then, act without having the sanction of one or two persons judgement of the world is secure whom I most looked up to and trusted. When Newman read St Augustine’s words of challenge to the Donatists: securus judicat orbis terrarium, (the I am far from saying that there is not a degree of judgement of the whole world is secure), he realised conviction so strong as to supersede all advice from that the theological position he had adopted as an others, nay all delay. Nor would I deny that there may be Anglcian was wrong. The description of the doubts supernatural guidances given in cases, of such a nature that overcame him when he read these words belongs as to require prompt and unhesitating obedience. And to some of the most striking we find in the Apologia. if I felt either this conviction or this guidance, I should have to act in a way which others would call rash, and Critic to try to remedy the doubts must leave my conduct in the hands of Him who had Many years later he wrote: ‘By those great words of inspired it.’