The Portal April 2016 | Page 24

THE P RTAL April 2016 Page 24 The reverse of a genuine interest in religion Is the current fascination for TV programmes and books about religion a genuine quest for the truth, or, as Geoffrey Kirk suggests, “a snobbish condescension”? S ome of you will remember, in far-off Anglican days, when every feast of the Church was accompanied by a media outburst from Dr David Jenkins (erstwhile Bishop of Durham) denying or attacking the doctrine in question. ‘A conjuring trick with bones’; ‘I wouldn’t put it past God to arrange for a virgin birth if he wanted to; but I very much doubt that he would’; etc., etc. Welcome, as Catholics, to the exciting world of déjà vu, where a former editor of the Catholic Herald has made an industry out of what for Jenkins was merely a hobby. roll call of absurdities The list of Peter Stanford’s books is a veritable roll call of absurdities. It was he who gave us an ‘in-depth’ study of Pope Joan, complete with the obligatory television programme. He it was who wrote the ‘biography’ of the Devil. And now he has given us a more ‘sympathetic’ Judas, and to go with it a documentary presented by the celebrity couch-potato Vicar, Kate Bottley. He seems determined to mar every Easter with a crass piece of populist revisionism. ‘Teach Yourself’ Catholicism More dangerously, Stanford is responsible for ‘Teach itself, but a good deal about contemporary attitudes Yourself ’ Catholicism. to religion. For publishing success, it appears, the approach must be oblique, the tone questing and ‘Catholicism: A Complete Introduction is sceptical. This is religion as a cultural artefact. We have designed to give you everything you need to entered a world where people go in search of things in succeed in your studies, all in one place. It covers places that are exotic or merely telegenic: ‘I have come the key themes and topics that you are expected to Jerusalem to uncover the truth about Judas’. And to understand, outlining the basics in clear the far-flung destination, unsurprisingly, proves to be jargon-free English, and then providing addeda place where the prejudices and preconceptions of the value features like key ideas, quotations, and even lists of questions you might be asked in your zeitgeist are obligingly confirmed. seminar or exam.’ The publishing success of such books – and beginners’ guide to Heaven Stanford has not been short of enthusiastic reviewers Stanford has even capped his achievements with a – shows the reverse of a genuine interest in religion, beginners’ guide to Heaven. even less a genuine thirst for faith.    It demonstrates, rather, a snobbish condescension. The faith of the What we learn from all this literary activity is very ages is tragically reduced to a branch of historical little about Pope Joan, the Devil, Judas or Heaven anthropology.  contents page