The Locksmith Journal Sep-Oct 2015 - Issue 40 | Page 70

70 • SAFES PROUD SPONSORS OF THIS PAGE Safes – Are We Playing Catch-Up With The Criminals? Mike Palmer FSyI has been involved in the safe industry for more than four decades, in 1995 receiving the accolade of the ABIS Award for “outstanding achievement in security and crime prevention”. »»I have always maintained that the decline of British safe making was caused by it becoming a victim of its own success. Commercial rivalry between the three leading protagonists; Chubb, John Tann and SLS had led to a creative hothouse where they all strived to develop the new locking systems and security barriers that would give them the competitive edge over their rivals. ‘explosive attacks on safes’ Chubb invented the isolator bolt-work system in which the action of locking the safe completely disconnected any link to the bolt-work. Once the safe was locked the handle spun freely, so no tension, pressure or force could be applied to the locking mechanism. They also pioneered ‘bell casting’ where four sides and the back of the safe were cast in moulds flooded with molten aluminium mixed with oxide nuggets – so called TDR (torch and drill resistant) alloy. With a bell cast safe there were no seams of joints to be exploited – all five sides were homogenous. locksmithjournal.co.uk | SEP/OCT 2015 Sponsored by TradeLocks CLEVER CONCRETE BARRIERS Meanwhile, John Tann was working hard to produce new ‘super concrete’ barriers. By combining chilled iron shot with concrete and adding special plasticisers, the patent Adamantium concrete could be poured into the body of the safe in an ultra-fluid state, allowing the mix to reach every nook and cranny. SLS was also experimenting with special inclusions to mix with their aggregates, including carbon fibres and metal needles. They developed revolutionary ceramic pegs placed over vital areas to protect against drilling.