The Locksmith Journal Jan-Feb 2015 - Issue 36 | Page 24

24 • TECHNICALADVICE PROUD SPONSORS OF THIS PAGE The Standard Answer In a series of controversial articles exclusively for the Locksmith Journal, Steve Stewart of Brisant addresses the real issues currently affecting the industry… »»“Having been instrumental in driving the need for the development of standards for lock snapping back in 2009/2010, I have spent the last few years biting my lip while a few, uneducated, internet warriors propagate their own ill-advised views, claiming authority on the subject because they sell a few locks online. Unfortunately these viewpoints are given on prominent locksmiths forums and go unchallenged. Just recently, a locksmith business’ ‘internet expert’ was claiming products did not have 3 stars because no Kitemark number was displayed. In speaking to genuine locksmiths it appears this area is becoming even less clear as time goes on. TS007 is not a BSI standard. In fact it’s not a standard at all. TS007 is a publicly available technical specification introduced and promoted by the Door Hardware Federation (DHF) with some co-promotion from the Glass and Glazing Federation (GGF). TS007 is a retro fit specification only, aimed at reducing burglaries by fitting enhanced cylinder options and has nothing to do with fitting hardware to new doors in a door factory. (The DHF and the GGF are predominantly made up of door and hardware manufacturers or glass suppliers/manufacturers). TS007 is a product test specification. As a cylinder manufacturer, I can take my product to a UKAS test house and have the test performed and, subject to a favorable result, get issued my test report . I then can badge my product TS007 3 Star. The approval also involves first getting an EN1303 (endurance and basic robustness testing) approval and GVA (pick, bump, and drill by locksmiths) test approval from the Master Locksmiths Association (MLA). So where does BSI come in? BSI offers third party accreditation. Ef