Test Drive | Page 146

Chapter  8:  Case  studies  in  Wadi  Siham     TDA’s   management  of   the  situation  seems  to   have   contributed  to  the  conflict.  On   the  one   hand,  in   early   2012,   person   83   managed   to   put   pressures   on   the   head   of   the   TDA   to   remove   the   wooden   plank   at   the   inlet   of   WMC3  and  to  refrain  person  82  from  putting  back  the  sand  bags  in  the  canal,  although  the  situation  remains   unresolved  today.  On  the  other  hand,  the  TDA  project  manager  thinks  that  this  is  an  unbalanced  action  against   person  82.  According  to  Ameen  Saleh,  the  head  of  operation  and  maintenance  at  the  TDA,  there  have  been   discussions  within  the  authority  to  replace  the  bags  in  person  82’s  canal  with  concrete  to  resolve  the  ongoing   conflict  but  the  request  is  awaiting  approval  and  has  been  caught  in  bureaucracy.     With   no   resolution   in   sight,   the   patience   of   both   sides   of   the   conflict   is   growing   thin.   Both   indicate   they’ll   resolve   the   matter   with   violence   if   necessary.   “Maybe   we   should   just   claim   all   our   land   including   that   in   which   the  canal  runs  and  let  the  government  deal  with  it.”  A  farmer  from  person  82  whose  father  donated  the  land   to  TDA  said.  Equally,  person  83  indicates  he’ll  “blow  up”  the  canal  and  put  the  old  Manadeb  system  back  to   work.         Person   82   did   not   try   to   reach   out   to   the   shaikh   simply   because   he   had   an   ongoing   conflict   over   land   with   person  83  in  which  one  person  was  killed  already.  “We  didn’t  want  to  add  this  to  that  conflict”,  he  said.       During   a   stakeholder   consultation   meeting   held   in   Amman   (see   Annex   6),   a   representative   of   the   TDA   and   person  83  revealed  conflicting  positions  of  the  matter.  The  government  representative  wanted  to  describe  the   crisis  as  a  result  of  several  natural  phenomena  (e.g.  the  Sesbania  propagation,  decline  in  rainfall  over  the  past   years  etc),  local  tribal  conflicts,  and  lack  of  enough  financial  resources.  On  the  other  hand  the  farmer  insisted   on   corruption   being   the   main   reason   behind   the   conflict.   Towards   the   end   of   the   discussions,   the   farmer   admitted  that  he  once  threatened  the  governmental  official  to  death  if  he  did  not  came  up  with  a  solution.     A   review   of   letters   issued   by   the   Ministry   of   Agriculture   indicated   that   the   ministry   instructed   the   police   to   interfere   and   arrest   one   of   the   influential   corrupt   farmers   who   was   stealing   others’   water.   However,   the   letter   was   suspicious   as   it   was   not   sent   to   the   police   by   a   court.   A   closer   analysis   by   the   research   team   of   several   other  letters  and  discussions  revealed  that  such  actions  were  taken  only  as  false  hints  by  the  government  to   show  that  it  was  trying  to  do  something,  which  in  fact  it  was