Chapter
5:
Analysis
of
stakeholders
in
Yemen
Interaction between coalitions
Third party
·∙
Interests and goals
·∙
Knowledge and
perceptions
·∙
Resources and
Power
Outcome
Accusing coalition
·∙
Interests and goals
·∙
Knowledge and
perceptions
·∙
Resources and
Power
Social network
Accusing coalition
Accused coalition
·∙
Interests and goals
·∙
Knowledge and
perceptions
·∙
Resources and
Power
(agreement or
conflict remains)
Social network
Accused coalition
Figure
5.3:
Interaction
between
accusing
and
accused
stakeholder
including
a
third
party
for
conflict
settlement
resulting
in
a
certain
outcome
(based
on
Evers,
2011)
In
some
cases,
the
State
might
as
a
third
party,
when
conflict
settlement
for
instance
is
sought
via
the
judicial
system.
The
state
can
also
provide
information
and
knowledge
on
the
water
resources
characteristics
to
influence
the
perceptions
of
the
coalitions
in
the
conflict.
More
likely
is
that
the
state
plays
a
minimal
role
in
the
context
of
the
conflict.
However,
state
representatives,
like
powerful
officials,
parliamentarians,
and
the
like,
can
on
a
personal
and
network
authority
play
an
influential
role
in
the
conflict
(settlement).
The
whole
state
institutional
arrangement
is
merely
setting
the
context
in
which
the
conflict
developed
and
is
settled,
and
it
does
so
in
interaction
with
customary
and
religious
institutional
arrangements.
From
this
context,
stakeholders
with
their
interest
and
influence
can
try
to
steer
the
outcome
from
the
conflict
settlement
process.
In
summary,
stakeholders
(coalitions)
can
be
categorized
into
the
fo