Evaluation for teachers
Gheorgheni-Romania 1-7 October 2017
Questions about the project in general
The information about the meeting was complete
We got very good information regarding the program, housing and general practical issues.
How was staying at the hotel:
It was good
Very good.
How was the activities:
They were interesting and they developed the meeting program
We think that the activities where good. The only thing that could have been better was that there was no organised activity for the students the last night which led to the situation that our students stayed out late (1 a.m.) at a local bar/disco. It was possible for the students to by alcohol at the disco which we don´t think is appropriate for kids at such young age.
The idea of organizing groups in order to let the student to get to know each other worked out great. Maybe it would would have been even better if the groups where smaller (5 students). This makes it easier to keep the group together.
Did you think the project moved forward? Why? Why not?
Yes, because we are following all the steps
Yes, the students met people from all the participating countries which was very stimulating for our students.
The treasure hunt was good. Good that we did the 3D in physical education.
Though I think that we should have used other software in physical education instead of CAD. The program was to difficult for some of the students.
Yes, because the objectives of the project were met.
Questions about the project meeting:
What improvements can we make for next meeting?
I don't think we need some improvements.
Try to keep 3D in focus!
Where there any topics that we should have discussed but didn´t?
No, I do not think so.
No. We had time and opportunity to discuss things.
Maybe at the beginning the country that receives make a forecast of expenses during the stay.
No
WORK
?
TIME
30