StomatologyEduJournal1-2015 | Page 41

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT NEED AND ORAL HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE OF SCHOOL CHILDREN Had difficulty doing useful jobs No impact 207 (98) 199 (98) 66 (86) 95 (99) 19 (54) 10 (43) Impact 4 (2) 3 (2) 10 (14) 1 (1) 16 (46) 13 (57) No impact 207 (98) 200 (99) 70 (92) 91 (95) 22 (63) 8 (35) Impact 4 (2) 2 (1) 6 (8) 5 (5) 13 (37) 15 (65) No impact 207 (98) 199 (98) 76 (100) 96 (100) 23 (66) 11 (48) Impact 4 (2) 3 (2) 0(0) 0 (0) 12 (44) 12 (52) 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Felt life in general less satisfactory Have been unable to function the impact of malocclusion on OHRQoL of young adults and emphasize the importance of patient-based evaluation of oral health status and oral health needs. However, they showed that orthodontic treatment needs did not significantly affect speech and word pronunciation. While similar to our study other researchers observed a strong association between speech disorders and dentofacial abnormalities (21-24). The difference between this study and the study conducted by Hassan and Amin Hel (20) might be the difference between the ages of the subjects since in their study the subjects were 21 to 25 years old. In a wider age range Masood et al (13) assessed OHRQoL in young people aged 15–25, and the association between IOTN, sex, age and education level, and OHRQoL. Similar to our study, they found that malocclusion has a significant negative impact on OHRQoL and its domains. Likewise, they reported no difference in impact between males and females. With respect to the gender differences, the findings of our study were in contradiction with the study of de Oliveria and Sheiham (25), who reported that sex significantly affects the impact of malocclusion on OHRQOL, and women were 1.22 times more likely to have an impact than men. Both IOTN and OHIP-14 are reliable instruments; nevertheless, they have some limitations. One of the major limitations of OHIP-14 is that it does not elicit the specific cause(s) of the impacts recorded, which can be related to a variety of oral health conditions and not necessarily the subject’s malocclusion. IOTN may be a relatively insensitive instrument to measure minor occlusal traits and irregularities which mostly affect patient appearance and about which a patient is deeply concerned (26). Conclusions Malocclusion has a negative impact on both physical and psychological aspects of the daily life of subjects who are in definite need for orthodontic treatment. These impacts are similar for both male and female subjects. Conflict of Interest and Sources for Funding: No Bibliography 1. Mohlin B, al-Saadi E, Andrup L, Ekblom K. Orthodontics in 12-year old children. Demand, treatment motivating factors and treatment decisions. Swed Dent J. 2002;26(2):89-98. 2. Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U. The impact of malocclusion/orthodontic treatment need on the quality of life. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(3):585-591. 3. van Wyk PJ, Drummond RJ. Orthodontic status and treatment need of 12-yearold children in South Africa using the Dental Aesthetic Index. SADJ. 2005; 60(8):334-336, 338. 4. Perillo L, Femminella B, Farronato D, Baccetti T, Contardo L, Perinetti G. Do malocclusion and Helkimo Index ≥ correlate with body posture? J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):242-252. STOMA.EDUJ (2015) 2 (1) 5. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403-1409. 6. Barbosa TS, Gavião MB. Oral health-related quality of life in children: part II. Effects of clinical oral health status. A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008;6(2):100-107. 7. Ballini A, Cantore S, Fatone L, Montenegro V, De Vito D, Pettini F, Crincoli V, Antelmi A, Romita P, Rapone B, Miniello G, Perillo L, Grassi FR, Foti C. Transmission of nonviral sexually transmitted infections and oral sex. J Sex Med. 2012;9(2):372-384. 8. Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(6):684-691. 41