INTRAORAL SCANS FOR CAD/CAM APPLICATION
To have the potential to keep pace with the digital
era change there is a need for education at the
undergraduate and postgraduate university levels
and also at the level of the dental designer training
programms.
Author contributions
All the authors (JB, A C, VV, IR, PH) declare to be
accountable for the whole content of the article.
Acknowledgment
Not applicable.
References
1.
Chatham C, Spencer MH, Wood DJ, Johnson A. The introduction
of digital dental technology into BDS curricula. Br Dent J.
2014;217(11):639-642. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.1049.
Google Scolar(6)
2. Available from https ://www.3shape.com/en/knowledge-center/
news-and-press/news/2014/go-digital Last accessed 15th May
2018
3. Bobich AM, Mitchell BL. Transforming Dental Technology
Education: Skills, Knowledge, and Curricular Reform. Journal
of Dental Education. 2017;81(9):eS59-eS64. doi: 10.21815/
JDE.017.035.
Google Scholar(1)
4. Available from https://www.planmeca.com/education/training-
for-dental-professionals/ Last accessed 15th May 2018
5. Available from https://www.3shape.com/en/knowledge-center/
webinars Last accessed 15th May 2018
6. Kóbor A, Kivovics P, Hermann P. [Dental materials and
Odontotechnology]. Budapest, HU: Semmelweis kiadó; 2015.
7. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH. et al. Intraoral Scanning
Systems – a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):101-
129.
[Pubmed] GoogleScolar(38) Scopus(20)
8. Logozzo S, Zanetti E, Franceschini G, et al. Recent advances in
dental optics- part-I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry.
Opt Lasers Eng. 2014;54(3):203-221.
GoogleScolar(91) Scopus(39)
9. Tartaglia GM, Penchev P, Sforza C. Integrating digital technologies
for dental prostheses: from impression to single crowns. A pilot
study. Stoma Edu J. 2015;2(2):162-167.
GoogleScolar(1)
10. Güth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, et al. Accuracy of five intraoralscanners
compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig.
2017;21(5):1445-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4
[Full text links] [Pubmed] Google Scolar (21) Scopus(11)
11. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from
conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend
Contin Educ Dent. 2007;28(8):422-424,426-428,430-431.
[Pubmed] Google Scolar(88) Scopus(34)
12. Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, et al. In vivo precision of
conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant
dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1495-1504. doi:
10.1007/s00784-015-1641-y
[Full text links] [Free full text] [Pubmed] Google Scolar(43)
Scopus(20)
13. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Accuracy of digital models
obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig.
2013;17(4):1201-1208. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0.
[Full text links] [Pubmed] Google Scolar(156) Scopus(79)
14. Hack GD, Patzelt SBM. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral
scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional
Product Overview 2015;10(4):1-5.
Google Scolar(11)
15. Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, et al. Assessing the feasibility
and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc.
2013;144(8):914-920.
[Full text links] [Pubmed] Google Scholar(57) Scopus(34)
16. Gan N, Xiong Y, Jiao T. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions
for whole upper jaws, including full dentitions and palatal soft
tissues. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158800. doi: 10.1371/journal.
pone.0158800.
[Full text links] [Free PMC Article] [Pubmed] Google Scolar(6)
Scopus(6)
17. Vecsei B, Joós-Kovács G, Borbély J, et al. Comparison of the
accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing
processes for CAD/CAM systems - An in vitro study. J Prosthodont
Res. 2017;61(2):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.001.
[Full text links] [Pubmed] Google Scolar (7) Scopus(2)
18. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, et al. Comparison of digital and
conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients'
perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical
outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014;14(1):10.
[Full text links] [Free PMC Article] [Pubmed] Google Scolar(118)
Scopus(66)
19. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, et al. Accuracy of full-arch
scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(6):1687-
1694. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y.
[Full text links] [Pubmed] Google Scolar(155) Scopus(83)
20. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions:
efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(1):111-115.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x
[Full text links] [Pubmed] Google Scolar(162) Scopus(95)
21. Joda T, Lenherr P, Dedem P et al. Time efficiency, difficulty, and
operator's preference comparing digital and conventional
implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral
Implants Res. 2017;28(10):1318-1323. doi: 10.1111/clr.12982.
[Full text links] [Pubmed] GoogleScolar(12) Scopus(4)
22. Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, et al. Digital versus analog
complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant
crowns: Operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent.
2015;114(3):403-406. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.003.
[Full text links] [Pubmed] Google Scolar(30) Scopus(15)
23. Available from: http://zdigitaldentistry.com/en/knowledgebase
Last accessed 15th May 2018
24. Zaruba M, Ender A, Mehl A. New applications for three-
dimensional follow-up and quality control using optical
impression systems and OraCheck. Int J Comput Dent.
2014;17(1):53-64.
[Pubmed] GoogleScolar(11) Scopus(6)
25. Gebistorf MC, Bader CL, Takeichi T, Katsoulis J. Prosthetic
reconstructions and referring implant survival in a postgraduate
program: a retrospective study. Stoma Edu J. 2016;3(2):223-234.
Judit BORBÉLY
DMD, PhD, Associate Professor
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry
Semmelweis University Budapest
Szentkirályi u. 47, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary
CV
Doctor Borbély is an Associate Professor at the Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
She graduated from the Dental Faculty of Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary in 2001, then she began
to specialize in prosthodontics. She received her PhD degree in 2008 on visual and digital methods for tooth shade selection.
She also works in private practice focusing on prosthodontics and aesthetic dentistry. Since 2011 she has been working with
digital impressioning systems. She conducts ongoing clinical research in digital prosthodontics and materials research. She
presents lectures, hands-on clinical and postgraduate courses on ceramics, tooth shade selection and intraoral scanning. She
is a presidential member of the Hungarian Prosthodontic Association and Hungarian Dental Association, she is a member of
Society for Color and Appearance in Dentistry and Hungarian Academy of Esthetic Dentistry.
116
Stoma Edu J. 2018;5(2): 110-117
http://www.stomaeduj.com