StomatologyEduJ 5(1) SEJ_5_1 | Page 44

ARE DENTAL MEASUREMENTS TAKEN ON PLASTER CASTS COMPARABLE TO THOSE TAKEN FROM CBCT IMAGES AND LASER SCANNED SURFACES? 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(5):886-895. doi:10.1016/j. ajodo.2016.04.021. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(2) Scopus(1) Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, et al. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(1):140-147. doi: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2012.06.018. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(96) Scopus(49) Gibelli DM, Pucciarelli V, Pisoni L, et al. Quantification of dental movements in orthodontic follow-up: a novel approach based on registration of 3D models of dental casts. Stoma Edu J. 2017;4(1):55-61. doi: 10.25241/stomaeduj.2017.4(1).art.5. Asgary S, Nikneshan S, Akbarzadeh-Bagheban A, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and dimensional measurements by using CBCT in mandibular first molars. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(1):e1-8. doi: 10.4317/jced.52570. [Full text links] [Free PMC Article] [PubMed] Google Scholar(1) Scopus(1) Codari M, Pucciarelli V, Tommasi DG, et al. Validation of a technique for integration of a digital dental model into stereophotogrammetric images of the face using cone- beam computed tomographic data. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(5):584-586. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.01.019. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(2) Scopus(0) Codari M, Caffini M, Tartaglia GM, et al. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12:113-121. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1453-9. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(2) Scopus(1) De Angelis D, Gibelli D, Gaudio D, et al. Sexual dimorphism of canine volume: a pilot study. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2015;17(3):163- 146. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2014.12.006. [PubMed] Google Scholar(13) Scopus(5) 14. Horner K, Jacobs R, Schulze R. Dental CBCT equipment and performance issues. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;153(2):212-218. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(26) Scopus(12) 15. Shaheen E, Politis C. The use of 3D virtual planning and 3D printing for the treatment of facial asymmetry: a case report. Stoma Edu J. 2016;3(3-4):156-161. doi: 10.25241/ stomaeduj.2016.3(3-4).art.4. 16. Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, et al. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:17e1-e9; discussion 17-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.021. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(200) Scopus(87) 17. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, et al. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(3):387-395. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(322) Scopus(159) 18. Radeke J, von der Wense C, Lapatki BG. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans. J Orofac Orthop. 2014;75(4):264-274. doi:10.1007/s00056-014-0217-9. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(14) Scopus(6) 19. White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-457. doi: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2009.09.019. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(55) Scopus(27) 20. El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, et al. Three- dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(2):259-265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.030. [Full text links] [PubMed] Google Scholar(71) Scopus(30) Luca PISONI DDS, PhD LAFAS, Laboratory of Functional Anatomy of the Stomatognathic System Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan Milano, Italy CV Luca Pisoni, DDS, PhD, is currently a member of the research staff in the Laboratory of Functional Anatomy of the Stomatognathic System - LAFAS, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health at the University of Milan, Milan, Italy. His fields of research are the morphological and metrical assessment of anatomical characteristics of craniofacial structures, dental arches, and teeth, including their modifications with age, sex and pathology. He authored/co-authored some papers published in international, peer reviewed Journals. He is also in private practice in Legnano (Milan, Italy). Questions 1. Which instruments can be used to obtain a 3D virtual model of dental arches? q a. Bite wing radiographs; q b. Ultrasounds; q c. Laser scans; q d. Conventional orthopantomographs. 2. Which instruments can be used to obtain a 3D virtual model of dental roots? q a. Laser scans; q b. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT); q c. Teleradiographs; q d. Surface EMG. 3. In the current study we assessed q a. q b. q c. q d. Three different methods to measure dental diameters; The effect of operator experience in making dental measurements; The use of Magnetic Resonance to measure dental diameters; Dental arch diameters in fully edentulous patients. 4. In the current study, we found that q a. q b. q c. q d. 42 Intra-operator error was larger than 20%; Measurements on the ultrasound reconstructions of the dental arches were clinically useful; Measurements on the laser scanned reconstructions of the dental arches were too prone to error; Measurements on the CBCT reconstructions of the dental arches were clinically reliable. Stoma Edu J. 2018;5(1): 38-42 http://www.stomaeduj.com