StomatologyEduJ 5(1) SEJ_4-2017r | Page 34

ORTHODONTICS IMPACTION OF TEETH - FREQUENCY AND MOST OFTEN USED TREATMENT PROTOCOLS Greta Roussanova Jordanova-Kostova 1a* , Pavel Kirilov Stanimirov 2a Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Sofia, BG-1431 Sofia, Bulgaria Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Sofia, BG-1431 Sofia, Bulgaria 1 2 DDS, PhD, Associate Professor a Received: July 21, 2017 Revised: August 16, 2017 Accepted: September 13, 2017 Published: September 14, 2017 Academic Editor: Mariana Păcurar, DDS, PhD, Professor, Head, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Târgu Mureş, Târgu Mureş, Romania Cite this article: Jordanova-Kostova GR, Stanimirov PK. Impaction of teeth - frequency and most often used treatment protocols. Stoma Edu J. 2017;4(4):264-269. ABSTRACT DOI: 10.25241/stomaeduj.2017.4(4).art.3 Introduction: Tooth impaction is a biological phenomenon that can affect every tooth group, but most often third molars, canines and second premolars. Methodology: The aim of our survey is to find out the prevalence of impacted teeth in different tooth groups. Another aim is to prove the following hypothesis, namely that there is a relationship between impaction teeth and treatment protocols using the method of distalization of the upper molars with the Pendulum appliance and also releasing space in the arc by the extraction of permanent teeth. The study analyzed 182 patients diagnosed with impacted teeth and excluded patients with impacted third molars. The analysis used the statistics packet SPSS version 13.0. Results: The most common impacted teeth are the upper canines - 137 teeth, followed by upper second premolars - 50 teeth, the lower second premolars - 27 teeth, the lower canine - 20 teeth, the lower second molar - 11 teeth, the upper central incisor - 8 teeth, the lower lateral incisor - 3. Significant statistical relations were found between tooth agenesis, odonthoma collections and tooth transposition with impaction. Patients in the early growth period stand a better chance not to undergo non-extraction treatment than those for whom the formation of the constant dentition has been finalized and who have passed the peak of their puberty growth. Conclusion: The early diagnosis of the problem is an important factor for a successful treatment. The growth potential of the patient is the leading factor that supports the processes. Keywords: impaction teeth, tooth agenesis, tooth transposition, odontoma. 1. Introduction Tooth impaction is a biological phenomenon that can affect every tooth group. Impaction is the process of tooth retention in the bone after its period of eruption and even a change in its position and location. The space for the impacted teeth in the dental arch is often small and even missing. This is the reason why teeth move and what most often occurs is mesial movement of the posterior teeth. The incisive point is mismatched to the middle line. There are also tooth discrepancies in the opposite side of the impacted tooth. Tooth eruption itself is a sequence of biological processes that are largely genetically guided and changed by the action of external factors. The reasons for impaction are researched by many authors. Here are some of them: genetic influence (enamel hypoplasia, aplasia of the second premolars, peg-shaped lateral incisors or their absence and others),¹ supernumerary teeth, changed position or shape of the roots of adjacent teeth (dilacerations), odonthoma collections, lack of space, crowding of the adjacent teeth, persistent or ankylosed primary teeth, cysts or bone formations that are obstacles to the eruption path, clefts and syndromes, bone or root resorption process, childhood traumas and others. 2 Impaction diagnosis is based on clinical and x-ray examination. Orthodontic examinations are usually supported by 2D X-ray images. In case impaction is observed, a CBCT is assigned. There are a lot of prognosis methods 3,4,5,6 techniques and factors for the probability of impactions of canines 7 which allow early prognosis and assessment. One of the factors for a successful treatment is the age of the patients. The management of the treatment 8,9 of an impacted tooth should go as follows: localization of the impacted tooth according to the planes (vestibule- oral, and central alveolar position of the germ), depth in the bone, prognosis for surgical access and technique. In case of cysts and other collections, what comes first is to determine the urgency of the case and whether orthodontic or surgical treatment is necessary. With respect to shaping and space gaining for the impacted teeth, the following solutions are possible: alignment of the teeth and space distribution; space gaining due to transversal expansion, distal movement, teeth proclination or slenderizing; space gaining due to tooth extraction; surgical exposure and orthodontic traction of the impacted tooth; finishing and retention of the case. The treatment plan often includes the extraction of the impacted canine. This decision is taken after assessing *Corresponding author: Assoc. Prof. Greta Roussanova Jordanova-Kostova, DDS, PhD, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia, 1, St. Georgi Sofiiski, BG-1431 Sofia, Bulgaria Tel. 00359877922665, Fax: 0035929524556, e-mail: [email protected] 264 Stoma Edu J. 2017;4(4): 264-269 http://www.stomaeduj.com