TRANSFUSION NEED IN ORTHOGNATHIC surgery - A REVIEW
Study n/N
%(95% CI)
Predonation policy
Blau et al. (1992) 17/30 56.7 (37.4;74.5)
Moenning et al. (1995) 2/67 3.0 (0.4;10.4)
Moenning et al. (1996) 1/88 1.1 (0.0;6.2)
Posnick et al. (2010) 2/34 5.9 (0.7;19.7)
Total 22/219
15.3 (2.6;46.2)
No predonation policy
Ash and Mercuri (1985) 6/8 75.0 (34.9;96.8)
Stewart et al. (2001) 1/2 50.0 (1.3;98.7)
Landes et al. (2008) 0/13 0.0 (0.0;24.7)
Kretschmer et al. (2008) 2/36 5.6 (0.7;18.7)
Choi et al. (2009) 11/61 18.0 (9.4;30.0)
Total 20/120
25.7 (6.4;58.5)
Overall total
42/339
% transfusion
20.6 (7.1;43.2)
Figure 4. Error-bar chart, bimaxillary surgery without additional surgery; dots representing % of transfusion, blue dots
represent study total, red dots represent group total, green dot represents overall total, horizontal lines representing 95%
confidence interval; overall % is an estimate using a beta-binomial model.
Table 17. Transfusion rate in bimaxillary surgery with additional or complex procedures.
Predonation policy Study n/N % 95% CI
No predonation policy Ash and Mercuri (1985) 6/8 75 (34.9;96.8)
Stewart et al. (2001) 1/2 50 (1.3;98.7)
Landes et al. (2008) 0/13 0 (0.0;24.7)
Kretschmer et al. (2008) 2/36 5.6 (0.7;18.7)
Choi et al. (2009) 11/61 18 (9.4;30.0)
20/120 25.7 (6.4;58.5)
Blau et al. (1992) 17/30 56.7 (37.4;74.5)
Moenning et al. (1995) 2/67 3 (0.4;10.4)
Moenning et al. (1996) 1/88 1.1 (0.0;6.2)
Posnick et al. (2010) 2/34 5.9 (0.7;19.7)
22/219 15.3 (2.6;46.2)
42/339 20.6 (7.1;43.2)
Total
Predonation policy
Total
Overall total
Where n is the number of patient and N is the total number of patient.
Table 18. Transfusion rate in bimaxillary surgery with additional or complex procedures; predonation versus no-predonation
policy, summary.
Bimaxillary surgery with additional or complex procedures
196
Patients (n) Autologous (n) Homologous (n) Predonation policy 219 21 1 22
No predonation policy 120 0 20 20
Total 339 21 21 42
Stoma Edu J. 2017;4(3): 184-199
n° transfused patients
http://www.stomaeduj.com