stomaeduj 2 SEJ_1-2017_screen | Page 35

notice in our study that, although not statistically significant, there was a tendency for PDs to avoid the use of CH [CH causes internal resorption 19,17 ] and chose either FS or FC equally (thus adhering either to the AAPD or the BSPD school of thought). Despite this, background training of those surveyed showed no clear relationship with the PM choice. Finally small proportions of GDPs and PDs (13.4% and 16.1% respectively) chose MTA as a PM medicament. No reason can be extrapolated, however as mentioned above MTA is known to be a costly material. 4.3. Discussion of the Hall technique (HT) The HT 6,10 is a method in which an asymptomatic, non- pulpally involved and aseptic carious primary molar lesion is managed unconventionally. The lesion is “biologically” treated by isolating it from the oral cavity; by cementing a conventional SSC on the tooth with glass ionomer cement in a child friendly play manner. 27 There is no LA, drill nor is there any tooth cutting carried out 6 . The first appointment involves fitting orthodontic separators mesially and distally to the tooth intended for restoration with the HT. The second appointment involves removal of separators 3-5 days after the first appointment and selection and cementation of the SSC with GIC by digital and patient bite pressure. 10 There was a mixed international reaction to the development to the HT in paediatric dentistry circles 28 with many authors supporting it 29,30 and others condemning it outright. 8 In the UK, some had gone so far as to describe it as the “Gold Standard” for restoring the multi-surface carious molar. 9 Our study investigated the knowledge and practice of the HT. It showed that a majority of those surveyed had heard of (n=91, 60.6%) but not practiced (n=122, 81.4%) the HT. The speciality had a significant impact on this as PDs were more aware of, and had practiced the HT more, when compared to GDPs (p=0.003 and p=0.003 respectively). This can be understood as the HT trials were designed and spearheaded in postgraduate paediatric dentistry environments 29 and developments disseminated in specialists postgraduate conferences, attended mostly by PDs. 1 However, some of the said studies were conducted in the primary dental service setting, i.e., GDPs. 6 Ideally; the ultimate aim of developing the HT was for GDPs becoming the end users of the HT in order to share the burden of caries management between GDPs and PDs. This was because most children are seen by GDPs not PDs. It appeared that our study had shown that there is a large gap between knowledge and practice of the HT in this region. One can also apply conjecture and assume that other confounding factors, such as opposition to the HT may also play a part in avoidance of practice, in addition to lack of appropriate hands on courses to cover the subject. However, the latter points were not investigated in this study and warrant further investigation. Finally, it may be useful to recall the responses highlighted in section a) of this paper’s discussion (RCM), as less than a quarter of the respondents only, would choose the HT as a treatment modality, in the given straight forward scenario. 4.4. Discussion of sealing dental caries (SDC) The therapeutic treatment of carious lesions in primary and permanent teeth by complete removal of caries and restoring the defective tooth structure had classically been advocated as the only treatment modality for many years. When taking primary teeth into account, this was confirmed to be the case by those surveyed in the first question in our study. On the other hand, the thought of SDC, especially in a permanent tooth, may be considered malpractice by many; however, it is now becoming acceptable that the therapeutic treatment of carious lesions by complete removal CONTEMPORARY DENTAL CARIES MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS IN PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY: A SURVEY OF AWARENESS AND PRACTICE OF A GROUP OF GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL DENTISTS Figure 9. Sealing-in caries and specialty (GDP or PD). No statistically significant results were found between GDPs and PDs. Stomatology Edu Journal 35