STANSW Science Education News Journal 2019 2019 SEN Vol 68 Issue 1 | Page 55

YEARS K–6 IDEAS FOR THE CLASSROOM Using Online Professional Learning Networks (PLNs) (continued) HOW CAN YOU HELP? Please become part of this international research. I am really keen to know your opinions about using your PLN, and how it contributes to your professional learning and/or development of your science teaching. You are all invited to use the link provided below to contribute to the research discussion. LINK to online international survey (Phase 1 of study): https:// bit.ly/2G4jwc5 Thank you. If you would like any more information regarding this study please contact me: [email protected] or my supervisor, Associate Professor Matthew Kearney: Matthew. [email protected] In addition to social, affective, cognitive and identity gains, Trust, Krutka & Carpenter’s (2016) study reported almost all participants (96%, n=487, approximately 25% elementary teachers) were “modifying teaching practice as a result of what they learned from their PLNs” (p.25) (albeit self-reported) and Trust & Horrocks (2018) state all of their participants from a professional learning community called DEN (Discovery Educator Network) reported positive outcomes for their learning and teaching as a result of their engagement. Specifically, more connected learning collaborations for their students; implementing new tools and technologies; as well as new strategies “shaped” and benefitted students’ deeper learning. Teachers (staff and school leaders) were gaining immediately relevant and applicable knowledge for their workplace, from their self-directed involvement and shared interactions, within an online community. As a special interest, purpose-built group, these interactions, could represent the entirety or only one part of a teachers’ PLN; regardless, teachers were thought to be developing professionally. The internet allows for extended PLNs and provides access to many groups for teachers to choose beyond their own school. Groups can be provided or moderated by staff from educational institutions, or informally initiated and run by educators like themselves. Many teachers now use PLNs in order to stay inspired, learn new approaches and gain support while they implement them. So what is the value for primary science teachers? The intention of this study is to explore gaps in the available literature relating to detail, nature and possible extent of development through online interactions. The implications of results from this study could be significant for in-service and pre-service primary teachers, if using PLNs has value for developing their own professional knowledge and practice, within science education. Could PLNs offer professional development opportunities beyond the usual modes of TPD? The consensus seems to be that these online spaces offer interesting polycontextuality; across platforms, international teacher groups (of varying experience, niche and broad expertise and differing opinion groups); a collective knowledge base yet personalisation of professional learning interactions (Tour, 2017). Whether formally (institutional) or informally (interested user) initiated and monitored, the value of multiple online collaborative and individual spaces, people and tools; and the detailed interactions mediated by technology, are under-explored. In the Australian NESA Teaching Professional Development survey (2017), while participant teachers reported favouring face-to- face professional development activities, online networks were another highly preferred method. PLN use is gaining traction as it can offer multipurpose, multiple contexts for professional learning and development at scale. PLN activities could be better utilised, and may be under- recognised by employers for their potential value as self-directed teacher professional development. This is surprising when the issues of effective primary science teacher professional development still exist, and there are beneficial findings as to the value of PLN’s. Teachers may be “liking” their work more (a pun on social media thumbs-up responses) as a consequence of using their PLNs, according to Rensfeldt, Hillman & Selwyn (2018). 55 SCIENCE EDUCATIONAL NEWS VOL 68 NO 1