STANSW Science Education News Journal 2019 2019 SEN Vol 68 Issue 1 | Page 36

ARTICLES Top FIVE STEPS in Championing STEM Innovations (continued) Figure 2. Three Student-Generated Solutions to Resolve Flooding Issues in Australia Figure 2. Three Student-Generated 3. Adopt a Transdisciplinary Approach Solutions to Resolve Flooding Issues in Australia In our approach, pedagogy not technology drives our STEM innovations. We start with the big ideas and be solved a singular point of tasks view. Furthermore, ask a ourselves what disciplines are needed for the integration. In from other words, disciplinary the ill-structured we 3. Adopt Transdisciplinary Approach in tandem with the principles of designing ill-structured design demand our students to use their knowledge from multiple disciplines and each problem cannot be tasks and In our approach, pedagogy not technology drives our STEM promoting design thinking, we anchor ill-structured tasks in real solved a singular point of view. in tandem with the principles of designing innovations. We from start with the big disciplinary ideas and ask ourselves what Furthermore, world contexts so that students appreciate the meaningfulness of ill-structured and integration. promoting In design thinking, ill-structured tasks in real Figure world 3 shows contexts disciplines are needed tasks for the other words, the we anchor their STEM learning experiences. the so increasing ill-structured we design demand students to use of their that tasks students appreciate the our meaningfulness their STEM experiences. 3 shows the Sneider, levels of learning integration in our STEM Figure innovations (Vasquez, knowledge from multiple and in each cannot Ivan, & Michael, 2013). Ivan, & Michael, 2013). increasing levels disciplines of integration our problem STEM innovations (Vasquez, Sneider, Multidisciplinary Disciplinary • Learning knowledge and skills separately in each discipline. • Example: Students learning separately in science, TAS, and mathematics classes. • Learning knowledge and skills seperately in each discipline but connected to a common theme. • Example: Students learning about flooding separately in science, TAS, and mathematics classes. Interdisciplinary • Learning knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines which are tightly linked to each other and a common theme. • Example: Students learning about flooding concurrently through an integrated science, TAS, and mathematics program. Transdisciplinary • Real-world problem-solving by applying knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines and students shaping their own learning. • Example: Students direct their own learning in relation to flooding, designing novel solutions using key ideas from science, TAS and mathematics, and documenting their processes using technology. Increasing integration Figure 3. Levels of Integrating STEM Learning Innovations Figure 3. Levels of Integrating STEM Learning Innovations 4. Assess for Learning We adopt an evidence-based approach to self-assess 36 our efforts and constantly refine our approaches based SCIENCE of EDUCATIONAL NEWS VOL 68 NO 1 on the evidence we gather – observations STEM programs, students’ reflections, surveys, teachers’