St Giles Hospice Walsall CQC Report 2015 Inspection report SGWH 2015 | Page 5

Good ––– Is the service safe? Our findings People we spoke with had no concerns about their own safety during their stay at the hospice and felt staff helped them to feel safe due to being there when they needed them. One person told us that they felt safe because staff made sure their pain was relieved and staff were always available to meet their needs during the day and at night. They told us, “I feel safe and secure here, the staff give me reassurance when I need it, this means a lot to me right now. If I need staff they come, make sure I am safe; it doesn’t matter if it is day or night. Staff have showed nothing but kindness, I have never once felt neglected by them.” Staff told us about how they would protect people’s safety from the risks of potential harm and abuse. Staff explained how they would recognise and report abuse. One staff member told us they had never witnessed any harm or abuse to people at the hospice. They said that they could, “Honestly say patients have never been harmed here none of us would tolerate them being harmed.” Staff consistently told us they would report any harm or abuse they witnessed to the appropriate senior staff on duty and felt confident appropriate actions would be taken so that people’s safety was maintained. We saw risks to people’s safety and welfare had been considered whilst they received their care at the hospice. We heard examples from staff where possible risks to people’s wellbeing had been assessed and actions identified to reduce risks. One staff member told us how people’s individual needs were assessed before and on arrival at the hospice. They were able to provide examples of where people may need support due to their deteriorating health condition which could impact upon their skin and walking abilities. We saw different risk assessments were used to both indicate the level of risk to a person and what preventative actions staff took to reduce risks to people. The registered manager gave us examples of where some people’s sore skin had been helped to heal which was positive as people were at times very poorly. Another staff member explained how people’s physical abilities were assessed to make sure all staff knew how to assist each person so that people received safe care consistently. Staff spoken with knew how to manage the risks to people who were using the hospice service at the time of our inspection. One person we spoke with told us 5 St Giles Hospice - Walsall Inspection report 21/12/2015 how they would be at risk of falling without the support of staff. They said, “The care they give me really helps me to feel safe, if I need any aids we talk about how they will help me and they make sure I have them but only with my agreement.” We saw staff had specialised equipment in order to meet people’s needs and reduce risks, such as, bed sides. Staff told us all equipment used was reviewed daily during each shift to further ensure people are not placed at risk due to the specific equipment in place. The registered manager and staff gave us examples of how they assessed and balanced the risks associated with what people wanted to achieve in their lives. One example was when a person suddenly changed their mind about where they wanted to die and wanted to go home. To enable this person’s wishes to die at home to be realised equipment and support was put in place in a timely way so that risks to their safety were managed and reduced. One staff member told us, “All the team here will always make sure patients are safe. We discuss safety and risks with patients and gain their views.” One person we spoke with confirmed this was the case. They told us, “The doctor has spoken with me about plans for when I leave here, so that I can get the care I need and I am safe.” We also saw the hospice environment supported people to meet their individual lifestyles so that people were not discriminated against whilst risks were reduced for other people. For example, we saw some people used the dedicated room for smoking which was situated away from the main rooms in the hospice so that this did not compromise other people’s needs and wellbeing. Staff told us, and records showed that when accidents and incidents had occurred they had been analysed so that steps could be taken to help prevent them from happening again. For example, when people had a pressure ulcer or when people experienced a fall the outcomes from the analysis were used to influence consistent staff practices. Staff told us and we saw from the last quarterly report specific equipment had been introduced so that the risks to people from falling and sustaining injuries could be reduced. This included movement sensors when these were assessed as appropriate for the person. People we spoke with did not have any concerns about the availability of staff to meet their individual needs at times they required assistance and support. One person told us, “When I need staff they are here immediately, I never have to wait which is what I need when I am in pain or need