SPS Aviation_5 Issue 5 May 2014 | Page 46

Last word Illustration: Anoop Kamath INSPIRE THE DISSUADED BIZAV IN INDIA There appears to be a confrontation of sorts building up leaks to the media by the DGCA as an effort to rather unfairly between the Business Aircraft Operators Association (BAOA) and target business and general aviation aircraft operators and as the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). A three-year “diversionary tactics to grab undue media attention in order to old body dedicated to promote business aviation in India, BAOA shift the focus away from their own shortcomings”. This whole issue has been a cause for consternation and represents business aircraft and charter operators as also owners of maintenance, repair and overhaul facilities – in fact prac- dismay amongst business aircraft operators as the environment tically everyone in the Indian aviation industry other than the in which business and general aviation operators in India are scheduled operators. BAOA has now confronted the DGCA for required to function, is not only unfriendly but extremely hostheir onslaught against business and general aviation operators. tile. The procedure for the issue and renewal of an Air OperaIn January this year, the US Federal Aviation Administration tor Permit (AOP) has been laid down in a document entitled (FAA) downgraded India’s aviation safety ranking from Category CAP 3100. Revised in August 2013, members of the BAOA find I to Category II laying bare the gross inadequacy of the DGCA to the process of acquiring an AOP or even its renewal to be an ensure safe air travel. This, action on the part of the FAA was “extremely frustrating” experience. BAOA is of the view that the triggered primarily by a shortage of qualified staff for conducting CAP 3100 is in itself questionable and not quite relevant to gensafety and airworthiness checks of Indian carriers. This, however, eral aviation. For a new entrepreneur it may take several years was not an overnight development as following an inspection a to obtain an AOP and that too after the arrival of the aircraft into few years ago, the FAA had indeed cautioned the Indian regula- the country. The enormous losses that the prospective operator tor of the possibility of downgrade if the inadequacies observed suffers on this account is of no concern to the regulator who is by the former were not addressed expeditiously. The focus of the neither efficient nor accountable. BAOA also believes that CAP FAA was on the poor safety oversight mechanism that the DGCA 3100 has provided “subjective power in the hands of DGCA offihad in place for the Indian carriers and not on operators in the cials, some of whom are taking undue advantage of it”. What the government and the DGCA need to appreciate is business and general aviation segments of the industry. Those affected most by the downgrade are primarily the full service that business aviation is a vital management tool for the corcarriers such as Air India and Jet Airways who cannot add more porate world and ought not to be perceived merely as personal flights to the US or enter into code share agreements with inter- indulgence and corporate excess. BAOA has been working on the national carriers. However, some of the low-cost carriers will also DGCA to restructure the regulatory framework and incorporate be affected as these have now become eligible to operate in the specific regulations for business and general aviation as well as international segment. Business and general aviation in India create a roadmap for its growth for the next 10 to 20 years. The industry is fully prepared to cooperate with DGCA in this effort. was apparently not in the sights of the FAA. Tragically, business and Possibly as a fallout of the general aviation in India is not downgrade by the FAA, DGCA growing as it should, in fact this appears to have been rather sudsegment of the Indian aviation denly galvanised into action and industry has been witnessing have begun carrying out random negative growth, the malaise safety checks on business and being attributable to an oppresgeneral aviation aircraft as well. sive policy framework and excesThis action by the DGCA comes sive control by the government. at a time when business aircraft It is high time that DGCA gets its including helicopters are in great act together and come formulate demand countrywide for charter rules and regulations dedicated by political parties to ferry their to business and general avialeaders across the nation on poll tion. These must be pragmatic, campaign. In the recent past, the easy to comply with and inspire media carried reports of a numgrowth of the industry instead of ber of cases of business aircraft proving to be a harassment for that were inspected by the DGCA the operators and detrimental to and found to be non-compliant aviation in general.  SP with the regulations pertaining to Regulations must inspire growth of the the stipulated minimum levels of industry instead of being detrimental to the safety requirements. The BAOA —By Air Marshal (Retd) interests of aviation in general. views the initiative at selective B.K. Pandey 44 ISSUE 5  • 2014 www.sps-aviation.com