SotA Anthology 2015-16 | Page 89

ARCH504 not an “economic proposition” at the time. Despite spending about two years trying to find an operator for a new hotel, the company admitted that “all our efforts in this direction have come to nought. We have combed England and the Continent in an effort to find [a] hotel operator, but although many have taken a closer look at the scheme none was prepared to go ahead.” associated with the high-rise walkways on the former Palatine site around the Palace night club and Coral Island. The drastic proposal was, unsurprisingly, unpopular with many residents and local journalists alike. In fact, there were so many objectors to the plan that they could not all be accommodated in the town hall, and a nearby theatre had to be hired for an inquiry into the development. In 1964 the local historian, A. F. Warner, argued that the council had made a “disastrous blunder”, highlighting how unnecessary the redevelopment was when compared to other towns around Britain: By 1965, Mr. Nickson admitted that “his company had closed down the residential and catering side of the Palatine as it had become less and less profitable” (Hawthorne, 1965, p.18). He further added that another luxury hotel in its place “would not be used much”, suggesting that the site was no longer suitable for accommodation use and that Blackpool itself was not a place to profit from exorbitant facilities. “most of the big development schemes either carried out or projected are in towns where bombing laid the property to waste, and something had to be done; or else in towns where business is a 52-weeks-in-a-year affair and not, as in Blackpool, restricted to a limited season of a few months when profit has to be made or it is not made at all” (Warner, 1964, p.8). Central Beach Development Despite the lack of appetite for a luxury hotel, Blackpool Corporation was nevertheless preparing to launch a £15m scheme that would require the redevelopment of 18 acres of central Blackpool, including a new purpose-built shopping facility, of which 16.5 acres would be compulsorily purchased. The proposal was described by Blackpool Corporation’s lawyer as “the first essential step towards reshaping the centre of Blackpool on modern lines” and “ambitious and far reaching: a viable and economic prospect” (ibid.). The area in question ran north of the old central station site up to the existing Winter Gardens, and would later be known as the Hounds Hill Shopping Centre. Somewhat alarmingly by today’s standards, only “the Tower and a few other buildings” were incorporated int o this new plan with the rest to be “demolished if it is approved”. Among the buildings proposed to be demolished were: The Queen’s Theatre (now a TK Maxx), the Grand Theatre (thankfully still standing), several stores, the Evening Gazette office and the Palatine Hotel. The proposal included plans to modernise the town centre with “skyscraper blocks [and] parking for 2,000 cars” along with the “complete segregation of pedestrians and vehicles” (Hawthorne, 1965, p.18), something that would later be Despite the local opposition, the scheme was approved in June 1967 by the Minister of Housing and Local Government, with the demolishment of the Grand Theatre and the Palatine Hotel designated to begin around 18 months later. Progress was slow, however, and in 1972 The Palatine Hotel was still standing. A decade had passed since the first sale and the site was sold off once again, to yet another London property development company, this time by Samuel Montagu and Co Ltd. on behalf of Trafalgar House Developments for £812,500. At the time, the developers had not decided the exact nature of the development but were “putting a lot of research into the possibility of some entertainment use” (‘£812,000 bid’, 1972). Eventually the Palace nightclub was built on the site. One of the major developments in the scheme was for a large indoor shopping centre that would cover a large portion 89