SotA Anthology 2015-16 | Page 85

ARCH504 In Blackpool, the juxtaposition of eras can be seen most dramatically between that of the Palatine Hotel and the now-iconic Woolworth’s Building. The Palatine site represents the 19th century tradition of single independent shops, most likely family run, which would cater for a single trade: Grundy’s gentleman’s hairdressers and Quinn chemist. The Woolworth Building, on the other hand, characterised the modern department stores of the 20th century that focused on mass-produced and cheaply made goods that could be bought all under one roof. The Palatine shops bear little aesthetic correlation to one another, with a variety of advertisements and signs all vying for attention, whereas the Woolworth Building’s sleek, contemporary design conveys a sense of uniformity and sophistication that made the Palatine Hotel look rather drab and out of touch with the general public. of the company owning the Royal Hotel, Mr. J. Parkinson stated that: “The intentions of Messrs. Woolworth is to pull down the present buildings, the stores, and hotel, and use the whole site for a superstructure which will be an ornament to the promenade” (‘Blackpool’s Growth’, 1935). At the time of construction, the Palatine Hotel and Buildings Co. Ltd. soon became concerned with the scale of the development. In 1936 they launched a legal claim to a “mandatory Order on the Defendants to pull down and remove all walls and buildings on the said site”, and an injunction to prevent the erection of the building. The claim in question was related to the Prescription Act of 1832 that entitled the company to the access and use of light. The Palatine Hotel and Buildings Co. Ltd. argued that the height of the building, varying between 80 and 119 ft., would have a detrimental impact on the business and therefore would “diminish the selling and letting value thereof”. The site was first sold to F. W. Woolworth and Company Ltd. in 1925 for a sum “which ran well into six figures”, making it “one of the biggest property sales ever known in Blackpool” at the time (‘The Royal Hotel Site’, 1925). The sale was in relation to the development of the site for a new Woolworth’s building, to be designed by Ald. R. B. Mather, “of the most modern type, with twice the present frontage to the Promenade” (ibid.). The first stage of the development was to expand the existing store and this was hailed as a huge success before the construction of the proposed Woolworth building even took place, with a local newspaper describing the opening as “an event in Blackpool’s life” and “one of the wonders of modern Blackpool”. The newly expanded store was praised for its modern interior and affiliation in name, if not in structure, with the Woolworth’s Building in New York, which at the time was “the biggest skyscraper in the world…rising to a height of nearly 800 feet” (‘A big new Blackpool attraction’, 1926). “The said new building of the Defendants has caused a substantial and material loss to and for the Plaintiffs’ said buildings of the light previously enjoyed…if the Ten years later, the site was developed once again for a monumental structure that would later become one of Blackpool’s most iconic buildings. One of the directors Figure 1: The Woolworth building, as shown on a 1941 cafe menu. © 3D and 6D Pictures Ltd. 85