Senwes Scenario October/November | Page 19

AGRICULTURAL Table 1. Interpretation of the results at the different collection points. Escherichia coli (E-coli) Predicted symptoms include: Skin irrita­tions, infections & intestinal disorders Guideline Blue Green Algae Predicted symptoms include: Skin irritations, infections & intestinal disorders E.coli counts per 100ml at sample points 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 93 9 24,810 10,810 411 48 15 5,980 770,100 249 43 13 11,190 6,910 613 41 17 2,420 155,310 56 Low risk of gastrointestinal disorders E.coli < 130 counts/100ml Guideline Significant risk of gastrointestinal disorders E.coli < 200 - 400 counts/100ml High risk of gastrointestinal disorders E.coli < 400 counts/100ml Blue Green algae counts at sample points 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 80 < 40 177 603 < 40 < 40 < 40 603 1,931 965 483 < 40 1,207 845 878 845 362 483 965 210 Low risk Blue Green Algae < 20,000 cells/ml Guideline Algal Pigments Predicted nuisance include: Scums & smells Slight risk of gastrointestinal disorders E.coli < 130 - 200 counts/100ml Moderate risk Blue Green Algae 20,000 - 100,000 cells/ml High risk Blue Green Algae > 100,000 cells/ml Blue Green algae counts at sample points 1 2 3 4 13 46 8 10 Low risk Chlorophyll-a < 15ug/l now under the spotlight. It is very difficult to reverse the impact of pollution and natural ways of doing it could take decades. Doing it by means of modern technology could also take a number of years at astronomical costs. Tests were done in the Sebokeng, Vanderbijlpark, Sasolburg and Vereeniging areas and the figures in Table 1 indicate the points where water samples were taken and the interpretation of the results at the different points. TREATMENT METHODS TO PURIFY WATER  Air Stripping In terms of this process, air is used to remove pollution. The system can effec- tively remove chemicals, which evaporate easily. Polluted water is pumped through a huge compartment and sprayed over a specific pressed material. The pressed material allows the water to slowly filter to the bottom of the tank. A fan simultane- ously blows air upwards, which results in the evaporation of the chemicals from the 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 25 62 173 13 76 Moderate risk Chlorophyll-a 15 - 30ug/l High risk Chlorophyll-a > 30ug/l water. The chemicals aggregate at the top of the tank, where it is treated, with no further danger of contamination.  Activated carbon filtering The process is generally used to remove pollution. Water is filtered by activated car- bon filters. The polluted water is pumped through columns of activating carbon. The chemicals attach to the surface while the clear water flows through. It is similar to the domestic systems being used. The disad- vantage of the system is that it does not break down the contamination particles. In order to remove these particles, the filters have to be heated and air has to be pumped through the columns to separate the particles from the carbon.  Using bacteria bioremediation Research done in New Delhi indicated that pollution can be removed economically from water by using biological products. Very good results have been achieved within a period of only two months. It is a 19 SENWES SCENARIO | SUMMER 2018 17