Science Education News (SEN) Journal 2018 Science Education News Volume 67 Number 3 | Page 50

YEARS 7–12 IDEAS ARTICLES FOR THE CLASSROOM Enhancing Adaptability in Grade 9 Boys through Task-Based Learning (continued) Implications for Future Practice and Research To be successful, this planning had to draw on the ideas of TBL and this also required careful thought about what tasks were appropriate. A further recommendation for staff teaching in NGLS is providing extra time to meet, plan, and adapt current curriculum. There are several areas worth pursuing further in research as well as best practice recommendations. As mentioned in the literature review, NGLS are continually being built in schools, universities and workplaces. It appears that there is a significant literature gap in evidence-based best practice use of a NGLS in secondary schools, particularly in the Science curriculum. As there has been a sustained impetus in the STEM curriculum areas, more NGLS have been commissioned in an attempt to promote innovation in teaching and learning. It is therefore important to develop emerging leaders of best practice pedagogy in NGLS. A paradigm shift in planning and execution of lessons is required to be successful. Regular training and resources are required to assist teachers in the adoption of a NGLS. Reflection This action research project has given me a greater passion for boys’ education and in finding solutions to complex problems in teaching. I wish to pursue further study in the area of NGLS. Since the project launch last August, more research has emerged on the topic and research groups are publishing more of their findings about evidence-based best-practice pedagogy. It is energising for me to see others engaged in similar research. The international aspect of the project also made the experience richer for me. I have enjoyed connecting with educators who share the passion for boys’ education around the world. For schools embarking on the brave move toward NGLS, the following recommendations will ensure that both staff and students experience a positive transition to the new environment: References • Professional development for staff regarding the best teaching techniques for NGLS. Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces: Re-thinking the architecture of post-compulsory education. Abindon, Oxon; New York: Routledge. • Student introduction activities in the NGLS. • Team teaching partners for staff to provide small-scale mutual support. Bassett, M. M. (2014). Self-directed activity-based learning and achievement in high school chemistry. Education Research and Perspectives, 41, 73-94. • Timetable and administration requirements optimised for the use of space (e.g. same two classes timetabled at the same time rather than rotating in and out throughout the timetable cycle to build team teaching momentum). Carr, N., & Fraser, K. (2014). Factors that shape pedagogical practices in next generation learning spaces. In K. Fraser (Ed.), The Future of learning and teaching in next generation learning spaces, 12. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research. Bingley, UK: Emerald • A collaborative, growth mindset and a team-focused school culture that supports teachers when they trial new teaching techniques. Ensuring enhanced student accountability of learning is important. With a student’s ability to move around the space more independently, there is a chance some students may use this independence to be less productive in their learning than usual. A teacher should establish classroom systems to maintain and enhance student accountability and evidence of their learning. Fraser, K. (2014). The future of teaching and learning in new generation learning spaces. In K. Fraser, The Future of Teaching and Learning in New Generation Learning Spaces, 12, xv-xxiv. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Throughout the action period, there was an opportunity to team teach with a colleague. Opportunity is perhaps the wrong word to use here, as team teaching became necessary, or else the teaching program would have suffered greatly. Much of the success of the project was due to a collaborative approach. There are many examples in literature of the benefits of team teaching. It is worth conducting further study to investigate the benefits of team teaching in NGLS. Heppell, S., Chapman, C., Millwood, R., Constable, M., & Furness, J. (2004). Building learning futures. The Building Futures programme. UK: CABE/RIBA. Retrieved from http://pasaporte. urosario.edu.co/urosario_files/3a/3ab3bd4d-2bf4-4e5a-94c9- 2b6da193db8f.pdf JISC. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning. London: JISC. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/ programmes/elearninginnovation/learningspaces.aspx Owing to this collaborative teaching approach, the teaching team needs time to plan together. Usually teachers met weekly to plan the next week’s lessons and to allocate space and resources. Keppell, M. (2014). Personalised learning strategies for higher education. In K. Fraser, The Future of Learning and Teaching 50 SCIENCE EDUCATIONAL NEWS VOL 67 NO 3