Science Education News (SEN) Journal 2018 Science Education News Volume 67 Number 3 | Page 44

YEARS 7–12 IDEAS ARTICLES FOR THE CLASSROOM Enhancing Adaptability in Grade 9 Boys through Task-Based Learning (continued) • enable new pedagogies, including technology-enabled pedagogies, to be explored and trialled (Boys, 2011; Carr & Fraser, 2014); Research Question How might participation in task-based learning help Grade 9 boys adapt to a next generation learning space? • are intentionally designed to facilitate collaborative, connected, and active learning (Heppell et al., 2004; JISC, 2006); Action Research Method • are technology-enabled and allow for students to use their own devices (Morrone & Workman, 2014); Action research relies on a “look, think, act” cycle of inquiry and action. It gives value to a small-scale classroom approach and does not rely on rigorous quantitative data analysis (Stringer, 2014). While adaptability traits have been measured quantitatively by Martin (2013), it is important to gauge whether students can articulate their own adaptability in a familiar classroom context. The localised nature of this project gives critical insight into behavioural, cognitive, and affective adjustment of boys in a NGLS. An advantage of an action research methodology is the opportunity for the researcher to change and adapt the process of the action if new information emerges during the project. Elements of TBL can be assessed and modified along the way if students and teachers can articulate a need. Furthermore, once a small-scale “look, think, act” cycle has occurred, a larger one can follow, so that the sphere of influence might be increased. Meaningful findings from the research can then be further investigated by schools and researchers as NGLS become more widespread. • include formal and informal spaces, physical and electronic spaces (van Schaik, 2014); • have comfortable furniture that is configured easily and quickly by academics and students to suit different pedagogies (Morrone & Workman, 2014). Ling and Fraser (2014) make it clear that although there has been a significant amount of work on designing Next Generation Learning Spaces, little has been done to observe what effect they have on student learning and which pedagogies might work best in such spaces. Even less research has been developed in the use of NGLS in secondary schools and the impact they have on high school students’ learning. This action research project is of significant importance to implement ideas from current research relevant to this area. The design for these new spaces most often draws upon cognitive and social constructivist learning theories (Ling & Fraser, 2014). Intended pedagogies are primarily student-centred approaches that identify children as intrinsically motivated and able to construct their own understandings of the world around them. TBL is an attempt to address the need for a new pedagogy in the NGLS since previous experience demonstrates classical techniques can have limited success. Successful transition from classical learning spaces to NGLS appears to present students with challenges and requires teachers and students to adapt to best utilise the opportunities afforded by the space. The most successful learners will be the ones who most swiftly adapt to the NGLS (Keppell, 2014). Literature Review It is critical to align action research with current literature if the proposed action is to be relevant and effective. This literature review discusses key concepts of the research question. Primary areas of interest include boys’ learning, NGLS, adaptability, and TBL. Next Generation Learning Space (NGLS) Next Generation Learning Space is a term used to describe a new type of classroom or learning environment. These types of learning spaces have been implemented across Australia in primary, secondary, and tertiary educational institutions, including Churchie Grammar School in Brisbane and Newcastle University in NSW. Similar designs have also been used when creating spaces for the mainstream workforce. Companies such as Google and Commonwealth Bank of Australia have included elements of the NGLS in their office interiors. With the variety of terms, including “innovative learning environment,” “hot desking,” “future focused learning space,” and “flexible work or learning,” there is a need to define these types of work spaces. Fraser (2014) clusters these spaces under the term “Next Generation Learning Space” (NGLS) and has collated the key aspects. Primarily, these are spaces that: Adaptability to NGLS For students to be successful in a NGLS, they must adapt primarily to the space and also to the teaching and learning styles that most appropriately accommodate the space. It is of critical importance to choose the most appropriate pedagogy to fit the space. As each space is different, it might be expected that a single pedagogy may not provide a solution for all spaces. Given the diverse range of these spaces and students’ familiarity with classical style classrooms, it can be a demanding task to adapt to these new classrooms. Martin, Nijad, Colmar and Liem (2013) define adaptabi lity “as appropriate cognitive, behavioural, 44 SCIENCE EDUCATIONAL NEWS VOL 67 NO 3