SA Affordable Housing November / December 2016 // Issue: 61 | Page 24
FEATURES
Shangase agrees on the affordability of this building
material. Clay face brick compares very well with other
building material and does not require any further
maintenance. “It comes in different colours and grading
allowing the architect and developer the opportunity to
explore different designs at affordable prices.”
“Aesthetics and ongoing maintenance play key roles in the
affordable housing segment and are often why more and
more developers choose clay face brick as their material of
choice,” says Shangase.
There are a vast range of paving bricks and colours to
choose from. “For low cost housing, the grey bevels would
be the most affordable as there are no colourants
involved,” Meyer suggests. “All options available depend
on budget and personal preference.”
BRICK IS THE WAY TO GO
In 2009 the Clay Brick Association began its research
programme to identify which walling types and
construction methodologies provide the best balance
between firstly cost, lifecycle cost, thermal comfort,
lifecycle energy consumption and achievement of dignity.
The first project took a 40m² low cost house as an example
and the research confirms that double skin clay brick
"It is important to find an experienced
contractor who can build according
to the relevant standards and
architectural specifications."
constructions are relatively cost effective compared with
light steel frame building (the latter was chosen to
represent lightweight IBTs in general). The research
established clay brick construction as an inspired design
choice for low cost housing, double brick construction
affording low total greenhouse gas emissions (embodied
plus operational energy) over a 40-year lifecycle.
Since that research ClayBrick.org has commissioned
research in respect of a 130m² standard brick house with
similar results. Simply put, clay brick is specified in
construction to afford optimal energy efficiency for houses
here in South Africa, lowest heating and cooling energy in
all six climatic zones of South Africa.
When it comes to using bricks in the affordable housing
sector, one really can write novels about the dos and
don’ts and a few more on why it should be the material of
choice. The executive summary? It’s a good idea – just
make sure the contractor knows what he’s doing!
SA Patent no. ZA2011/01062
Brick easy is essentially a system to lay bricks in a new and improved manner. The only tool required
for the actual laying of the bricks is a pair of gloves for the bricklayer and the other components of the
team. Any labourer with a minimum amount of training can easily be part of a team of three that can
lay 500 bricks in an hour.
THE STRUCTURAL BENEFITS OF BRICK EASY:
The other important function which the profile performs, is the strength
offered when the brick is laid against it – as opposed to virtually zero
strength of the traditional fish line. The bricklayer is able to force the brick
flush against the profile and push the next brick and mortar vertically to
close the gaps between bricks. This means that there will not be any air
gaps between bricks and that the mortar will be adhesive to the entire
brick, making the brickwork very strong.
The Headed or English bond which is seldom used nowadays, is easy to
lay with this system. By using the mortar box to spread the fluid mortar,
the bricklayer simply has to slide the brick over, taking enough mortar with
the brick to push against the next brick and close the vertical joint
completely.
HIGH PRODUCTIVITY: THREE SEMI-SKILLED WORKERS
500 BRICKS PER HOUR
Giuseppe Dalla Torre
+27 (0) 83 305 5191
[email protected]
The little building pictured, measuring approximately 5m², was not only built for the purpose of the
SABS test, but also to see how quick a building labourer could learn how to use the Brick Easy
System. The SABS test was successful on all the requirements and parameters and a Certificate
was issued. With a little bit of supervision, the three building labourers were able to lay six hundred
bricks in the first hour, and two hours later the job was completed.
W hen the time came to demolish the little building, I used a two and a half ton fork lift with a
weight of fou r tons. I pointed the forks two brick courses from the top of the building, kept a
distance of half a meter from the building and proceeded to impact the forks against the wall.
However, there was no sign of movement and no cracks were noted. Only on the second attempt
at the top brick course of the building did I manage to dislodge some bricks. I could not continue
using the fork lift for fear of damaging it, and I opted for an air-driven breaker which still took a
long time to eventually demolish the building.