Re: | Page 52

was passed – the Bill of Rights – protecting freedom of speech and limiting the powers of the sovereign monarchy. Unfortunately for William, he would be better remembered for influencing the events that would lead to 60 years of juniper scented social degeneration. Enter ‘Mothers Ruin’. William III began his reign by imposing high taxes on the import of many luxury foreign goods while banning the popular French brandy outright as it represented his lifelong enemy King Louis XIV. At the heart of William’s decision lay an attempt to increase the sale of national produce. The same produce from which most ardent spirits were distilled. It could be argued that while it appeared that William’s prime focus was economic growth, he was actually helping line the pockets of many members of the House of Lords who had helped him ascend the throne and who also happened to be the landlords for a number of farms which produced the nation’s corn and wheat. One of the first major flaws in William’s plan appeared with the Distillers Act of 1690 which disbanded the role of the Worshipful Company of Distillers and with it the regulatory systems they advocated. Furthermore, the Act allowed for private citizens to start distilling their own spirits (from English produce) with no limit on volume or licence controls, merely by displaying a notice of intent for ten days prior to manufacture. As a result, by the end of the 1692 national gin production had rocketed to 500,000 gallons a year; and that was only what was known about. bloodletting as they were with the ‘short back and sides’. The spirit we know today as ‘gin’ isn’t found in recorded history until a century and a half after this period, in a political study entitled The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits by Bernard Mandeville. In his satirical work Mandeville writes, “Nothing is more destructive, either in regard to the health or the vigilance and industry of the poor, than the infamous liquor, the name of which, derived from Juniper in Dutch […] shrunk into a monosyllable, intoxicating Gin”. Mandeville continues on, claiming that: “[gin] charms the unactive, the desperate and crazy of either sex, and makes the starving sot behold his rags and nakedness with stupid indolence. It is a fiery lake that sets the brain in flame, burns up the entrails, and scorches every part within; and, at the same time, a Lethe of oblivion, in which the wretch immersed drowns”. 50 Mandeville’s observations, while rich in vitriol, were written at the beginning of an era in England known today as ‘The Gin Craze’. An era which would prove Mandeville’s acrimonious assessment to be an all too accurate reality. From its lofty position alongside brandy as the preferred beverage of the English aristocracy, genever, or simply ‘Holland’s Gin’, would suddenly and severely dive to the darkest depths of societal destitution; becoming an icon of the poor, the weak and the depraved. Affectionately personified by the moniker ‘Madam Genever’, the beverage came to be more commonly referred to by one of many dysphemism’s such as ‘Mothers Ruin’, ‘Ladies Delight’, ‘Cuckold’s Comfort’ and ‘Strip M e Naked’; to name but a few. Gin’s sudden and headlong plunge from the elegant coffee houses and private domiciles of the elite to the most wretched slums of London can somewhat unfairly fall to the culpability of one man. William III or ‘King Billy’ as he was known by the Scots and the Irish, ascended the throne of England in 1689 becoming Regent and joint monarch alongside his bride Queen Mary II. That same year one of England’s most important constitutional documents William’s second major miscalculation became apparent with the passing of the Bank of England Act in 1694 which raised duties and taxes imposed on the production of beer, ale and other alcohols (excluding gin) under the pretence of supporting the war against France. As a consequence, fortified gin become cheaper by volume than beer. By 1721, English Excise and Revenue records noted that approximately one quarter of London’s residents were employed in the production of gin; generating almost 2 million gallons (9.1 million litres) of tax free spirit a year. Over the following decade, gin consumption doubled again. London’s inebriant half a million population were able to purchase a dram of overproof gin for little more than a penny from a choice of more than 6000 gin shops (ironically referred to as ‘Gin Palaces’). As a consequence London, along with other major English cities, began to fall into a well-documented ‘drunken stupor’. A pamphlet published in 1736 by a teetotal minority entitled Distilled Liquors: The Bane of the Nation mentioned: “In one place not far from